Evaluation of the Hamilton‐Thorn 2030 motility analyser for routine semen analysis in an infertility clinic

Abstract

In routine semen analysis of 242 patients the values of sperm concentration, sperm motility and progressive sperm motility were measured with the Hamilton-Thorn semen analyser (HT) and compared to the data obtained by conventional semen analysis according to the guidelines of the WHO. Overall, the HT gave higher values for sperm concentration (mean difference 21.7 +/- 46.2 x 10(6) ml-1, mean +/- SD). Motility values showed a correlation of 0.67 (slope 0.94, P less than 0.001) but were estimated lower by the HT than by conventional analysis (mean difference 7.3 +/- 21.7%); this was caused by the overestimation of sperm concentration. In the range from 0 to 50% motility the HT yielded lower values and higher values from 50 to 100% motility. Progressive motility values of the HT agreed better with conventional analysis (WHO categories a + b): the mean difference of all values was 0.5 +/- 19.5% (r = 0.74, slope = 1.0). The mean lateral head displacement measured by the HT increased with increasing sperm path velocity, but other significant correlations between sperm movement parameters could not be demonstrated. In many instances round cells and debris could not be distinguished from normal sperm. In conclusion, the HT system cannot replace conventional semen analysis in routine diagnosis.

Influence of Pentoxifylline on Human Sperm Motility in Asthenozoospermic Individuals Using Computer-Assisted Analysis

“…After centrifuging at 300g for 20 min the supernatant was discarded and the pellet was resuspended in Earle's medium. A final concentration of 10-50 milliodmL was obtained, as recommended by Hamilton Thorn Research and similar to that suggested by Neuwinger et al [12]. The sample was then divided into two equal volumes.…”

Validation and Usefulness of the Sperm Quality Analyzer (SQA II‐C) for Bull Semen Analysis

“…1992). The conventional semen parameters that are examined are the concentration, the percentage of motile spermatozoa and their morphological grading (Neuwinger et al. 1990b).…”

Laboratory standards in routine clinical andrology

“…1516 The latter problem is typical of many CASA instruments. 66 Although these studies established the necessity of diluting semen samples to sperm concentrations of 40-50 x 10 6 /ml for reliable CASA measurements, very few re-evaluation studies have appeared. One study did report such data as a rebuttal of earlier findings (albeit an invalid comparison), stating that CellSoft's count and motility values were completely acceptable for routine purposes.…”