2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0531.2005.00584.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation and Usefulness of the Sperm Quality Analyzer (SQA II‐C) for Bull Semen Analysis

Abstract: In this study, an upgrade version of the Sperm Quality Analyzer (SQA), the SQA-IIC was tested for the assessment of bull semen quality. In Expt 1, the device showed good repeatability of measurements within and between capillaries, as evidenced by the low coefficients of variation (CVs; < 13%) at concentrations between 35 and 705 x 10(6) spermatozoa/ml. In Expt 2, 10 semen concentrations (1-1000 x 10(6)/ml) were stored in HEPES TALP for 48 h at room temperature. A time-dependent decrease in sperm motility inde… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
5
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
6
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…High repeatability of measurements was observed for all parameters assessed, since the CV's of the results remained below 10%. These findings are in agreement with findings in previous studies in dogs [Iguer-Ouada and Verstegen 2001b;Rijsselaere et al 2003;Schäfer-Somi and Aurich 2007] and bulls [Hoflack et al 2005] using different types of CASA systems. It is, however, important to emphasize that variations of 30 -60% were obtained when the motility of the same ejaculate was assessed using subjective microscopy by different observers within the same laboratory [Verstegen et al 2002].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…High repeatability of measurements was observed for all parameters assessed, since the CV's of the results remained below 10%. These findings are in agreement with findings in previous studies in dogs [Iguer-Ouada and Verstegen 2001b;Rijsselaere et al 2003;Schäfer-Somi and Aurich 2007] and bulls [Hoflack et al 2005] using different types of CASA systems. It is, however, important to emphasize that variations of 30 -60% were obtained when the motility of the same ejaculate was assessed using subjective microscopy by different observers within the same laboratory [Verstegen et al 2002].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The following results are presented in Table 2 and Fig. 2 The rapid motile spermatozoa had higher values for velocity and progressiveness (VCL, VAP, VSL, ALH, STR and LIN) as similar patterns were observed by Hoflack et al (2005) in Holstein Friesian bulls. The spermatozoa in medium motile subpopulations although having straight line progression had poor velocity (low VAP, VCL, ALH and BCF).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Dilution of these ejaculates is necessary for accurate assessment of sperm quality. A decline in sperm motility as concentration increases has been reported in studies on bovine and human semen with automated semen analyzers (Bartoov et al, 1991; Hoflack et al, 2005). Collision between cells and restriction in movement from being in a condensed state were suggested to be likely causes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%