2018
DOI: 10.1111/1752-1688.12610
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) Satellite Rainfall Products over the Lower Colorado River Basin, Texas

Abstract: Quality of precipitation products from the Integrated Multi‐satellitE Retrievals for Global Precipitation Measurement mission (IMERG) was evaluated over the Lower Colorado River Basin of Texas. Observations of several rainfall events of a wide range of magnitudes during May 2015 by a very dense network of 241 rain gauges over the basin were used as a reference. The impact of temporal and spatial downscaling of different satellite products (near/post‐real‐time) on their accuracy was studied. Generally, all IMER… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
57
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
5
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The work in Muster et al [52], which examines water body mapping at different resolutions, adds that the decrease of resolution not only leads to the omission of small water bodies and misclassification of border pixels, but also may result in local overestimation of water surface area when clusters of small water bodies are merged into single larger water bodies. Accuracy fluctuations between satellite products of varying spatial resolution are also indicated in the evaluation study of Omnarian et al [53]. Except for the resolution difference, an additional factor that may cause partial disagreement between S2 and Landsat maps is the possible classification errors in the Landsat maps.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The work in Muster et al [52], which examines water body mapping at different resolutions, adds that the decrease of resolution not only leads to the omission of small water bodies and misclassification of border pixels, but also may result in local overestimation of water surface area when clusters of small water bodies are merged into single larger water bodies. Accuracy fluctuations between satellite products of varying spatial resolution are also indicated in the evaluation study of Omnarian et al [53]. Except for the resolution difference, an additional factor that may cause partial disagreement between S2 and Landsat maps is the possible classification errors in the Landsat maps.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The final paper in this featured collection (Omranian and Sharif ) evaluates the accuracy of different satellite‐derived precipitation products over the Lower Colorado River in Texas. The accuracy of any hydrological model is dependent upon the robustness of its precipitation input.…”
Section: Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In forecasting modeling frameworks (e.g., NWM), spatial and temporal scaling of recent and forecasted precipitation data add a layer of complexity which is challenging to evaluate. Omranian and Sharif () evaluated the impact of spatial and temporal downscaling of the Integrated Multi‐satellitE Retrievals for Global Precipitation Measurement mission (IMERG) products by comparing them to in situ observations at 214 rain gauges. They found IMERG products better correspond to observed precipitation when downscaled, but more improvement is needed.…”
Section: Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the United States, based on a U.S. National Weather Service (NWS) report, the average annual property/human losses are estimated to be more than $8 billion [1][2][3] (Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), 2013). Flood inundation maps help to detect flood-prone regions and can prevent major catastrophe by providing reliable information to the public about the flood-risk [4,5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%