Evaluation of the Global Land Data Assimilation System using global river discharge data and a source‐to‐sink routing scheme

Abstract

[1] Advanced land surface models (LSMs) offer detailed estimates of distributed hydrological fluxes and storages. These estimates are extremely valuable for studies of climate and water resources, but they are difficult to verify as field measurements of soil moisture, evapotranspiration, and surface and subsurface runoff are sparse in most regions. In contrast, river discharge is a hydrologic flux that is recorded regularly and with good accuracy for many of the world's major rivers. These measurements of discharge spatially integrate all upstream hydrological processes. As such, they can be used to evaluate distributed LSMs, but only if the simulated runoff is properly routed through the river basins. In this study, a rapid, computationally efficient source-to-sink (STS) routing scheme is presented that generates estimates of river discharge at gauge locations based on gridded runoff output. We applied the scheme as a postprocessor to archived output of the Global Land Data Assimilation System (GLDAS). GLDAS integrates satellite and ground-based data within multiple offline LSMs to produce fields of land surface states and fluxes. The application of the STS routing scheme allows for evaluation of GLDAS products in regions that lack distributed in situ hydrological measurements. We found that the four LSMs included in GLDAS yield very different estimates of river discharge and that there are distinct geographic patterns in the accuracy of each model as evaluated against gauged discharge. The choice of atmospheric forcing data set also had a significant influence on the accuracy of simulated discharge.Citation: Zaitchik, B. F., M. Rodell, and F. Olivera (2010), Evaluation of the Global Land Data Assimilation System using global river discharge data and a source-to-sink routing scheme, Water Resour. Res., 46, W06507,

Estimation of Lake Outflow from the Poorly Gauged Lake Tana (Ethiopia) Using Satellite Remote Sensing Data

“…The values for several parameters in the default global model may be inappropriate to represent the local situation of the poorly gauged Lake Tana Basin. In addition, notable errors in the Noah modelled outputs have been reported for several river basins [66,67]. The above issues reduced our confidence in the accuracy of the Noah soil moisture data for Lake Tana Basin.…”

Global analysis of seasonal streamflow predictability using an ensemble prediction system and observations from 6192 small catchments worldwide

“…Arguably, a diverse multimodel, multiforcing ensemble system is a preferable approach to dealing with deficiencies in individual forcing data and models [cf. Zaitchik et al, 2010] but would obviously be more challenging to implement and maintain.…”

“…It was not possible to determine whether the observed performance differences were due to the different hydrological model (version) or forcing data [cf. Zaitchik et al, 2010]. A comparative evaluation of W3RA and the four GLDAS models against the global streamflow records showed some regions where the W3RA forecast system could be improved; in particular, the dry interior of the United States and Canada, where VIC performed better.…”

Potential of Using Remote Sensing Techniques for Global Assessment of Water Footprint of Crops

“…The storage term obtained from GRACE contains validation errors, in terms of 'equivalent water height', of 2-3 cm, according to Liu et al [64]. Finally, runoff estimates are highly dependent on the land surface model used in GLDAS, where validation activities provided annual differences lower than 30% in the basins of Europe by using the VIC model [65]. In this analysis, three values for monthly precipitation (50, 100 and 200 mm), and errors of 10% and 100% are considered.…”