Evaluation of the efficacy of a short-course, personalized self-management and intensive spa therapy intervention as active prevention of musculoskeletal disorders of the upper extremities (Muska): a research protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Abstract

BackgroundMusculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) constitute a major occupational health problem in the working population, substantially impacting the quality of life of employees. They also cause considerable economic cost to the healthcare system, with, notably, the reimbursement of treatments and compensation for lost income. MSDs manifest as localized pain or functional difficulty in one or more anatomical areas, such as the cervical spine, shoulder, elbow, hand, and wrist. Although prevalence varies depending on the region considered and the method of assessment, a prevalence of 30% is found in different epidemiological studies. The disease needs to be prevented, not only for medical and economic reasons, but also for legal reasons, owing to the requirement of assessing occupational risks. The strategy envisaged may thus revolve around active, multimodal prevention that has employees fully involved at the heart of their care. Although physical exercise is widely recommended, few studies with a good level of evidence have enabled us to base a complete, well-constructed intervention on exercise that can be offered as secondary prevention in these disorders.MethodsA prospective, multicenter, comparative (intervention arm vs. control arm), randomized (immediate vs. later treatment) study using Zelen’s design. This study falls under active prevention of MSDs of the upper extremities (UE-MSDs). Participants are workers aged between 18 and 65 years with latent or symptomatic MSDS, with any type of job or workstation, with or without an history of sick leave. The primary aim is to show the superiority at 3 months of a combination of spa therapy, exercise, and self-management workshops for 6 days over usual care in the management of MSDs in terms of employee functional capacity in personal and professional daily life. Secondary aims are to assess the benefit of the intervention in terms of pain, quality of life, and accumulated duration of sick leave.DiscussionThis randomized controlled trial is the first that will aim to evaluate multidisciplinary management of UE-MSDs using nonpharmacological treatment combining exercise, self-management, and spa therapy. The originality of this intervention lies, in its short, intensive format, which is compatible with remaining in work; and in its multidisciplinary approach. This trial has the potential to demonstrate, with a good level of evidence, the benefits of a short course of spa therapy combined with a personalized self-management program on the functional capacity, pain, and quality of life of employees in their daily life.Trial registrationClinical trial.gov NCT02702466 retrospectively registered. Protocol: Version 4 of 9/10/2015.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12891-016-1353-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Efficacy of self-management exercise program with spa therapy for behavioral management of knee osteoarthritis: research protocol for a quasi-randomized controlled trial (GEET one)

“…A combination of spa therapy, physical exercise, and self-management was found to benefit fibromyalgia symptoms [ 23 ]. Another study of low back pain, self-management exercise and spa therapy treatment (STT) is under way [ 24 ].…”

Influence of anaerobic and aerobic exercise on age-related pathways in skeletal muscle

“…A personalized physical exercise approach during or after treatment of patients has provided a more sustainable impact on the physical activity level in breast cancer patients than the usual care, suggesting that the rehabilitation program should be personalized (Baumann et al, 2016). Personalized self-management program including exercise has been also used to increase active prevention in musculoskeletal disorders (Lanhers et al, 2016), and exercise interventions in clinical trials have raised positive results by 67% on quality of life outcomes of prostate cancer patients (Menichetti et al, 2016). Various ‘omics’ approaches should be also included to identify similarities and differences of the crosstalk among tissues and organs and elucidate the molecular mechanisms implicated in the beneficial outcomes of exercise (Tanaka et al, 2016).…”