1996
DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/8.3.211
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Guidelines, Audit and Feedback: Improving the use of Intravenous Thrombolysis in Patients with Suspected Acute Myocardial Infarction

Abstract: medical audit can be an effective means of improving the use of intravenous thrombolytics. It is possible that over auditing may result in greater inappropriate use.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this area, the research trials that established efficacy had been completed by 1973. However in a study by Robinson et al (1996) the proportion of patients receiving such treatment (a seemingly straightforward and uncontroversial one compared to psychological treatments) ranged from 57% to in four different hospitals. Baker and Firth-Cozens also point out that the gap between efficacy trials and Clinical Guidelines was at least 13 years.…”
Section: Availabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this area, the research trials that established efficacy had been completed by 1973. However in a study by Robinson et al (1996) the proportion of patients receiving such treatment (a seemingly straightforward and uncontroversial one compared to psychological treatments) ranged from 57% to in four different hospitals. Baker and Firth-Cozens also point out that the gap between efficacy trials and Clinical Guidelines was at least 13 years.…”
Section: Availabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MFSs have been found to have a positive impact on outcomes in different subspecialties of medicine (Duncan & Pozehl, 2000; Goebel, 1997; Holmboe, Scranton, Sumption, & Hawkins, 1998; Leshan, Fitzsimmons, Marbella, & Gottlieb, 1997; Mazonson et al, 1996; Robinson, Thompson, & Black., 1996; Rokstad, Straand, & Fugelli, 1995; Tabenkin et al, 1995), education (Arco, 1997; Furman, Adamek, & Furman, 1992; Mortenson & Witt, 1998; Rose & Church, 1998; Tuckman & Yates, 1980), and mental health (Chorpita, Bernstein & Daleiden, 2008; Chorpita, Bernstein, Daleiden, 2011; Howe, 1996; Lambert et al, 2001; Lambert et al, 2005; Lambert, Hansen & Finch, 2001; Mazonson et al, 1996). While quality improvement tools, such as MFSs (Cebul, 2008), have been successfully applied for several decades (Kluger & Denisi, 1996; Rose & Church, 1998), their use is not widespread within children’s mental health services.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In improving care of patients with ACS, controlled trials conducted in the USA, 26,27 the United Kingdom 28 and Queensland 29 have shown the positive effects of guideline‐linked audit and feedback, 26−29 implementation of critical care paths, 26,27 targeted professional tuition 28,29 and combinations of multiple strategies 27−29 on the use of key pharma­cotherapies (such as thrombolysis, aspirin and beta‐blockers). These methods, together with innovative techniques such as patient education tools 18 and portable decision‐support systems, 19 are being adopted within quality improvement projects with positive results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%