2010
DOI: 10.1149/1.3367922
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the Effect of Copper Electrowinning Parameters on Current Efficiency and Energy Consumption Using Surface Response Methodology

Abstract: IntroductionProducing high quality copper cathode with minimum energy consumption and maximum current efficiency is a goal for all copper electrowinning (CuEW) operations. To attain this goal, operators need a simple method to understand the effects and interactions between common parameters affecting the production of copper by electrowinning. Therefore, a detailed statistical analysis was performed to understand the effects of several parameters and their resulting synergetic effects on the performance of th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering the obtained Fe concentration of 1.4 g/L in the stripped solution, the expected current efficiency is approximately 95%, which is in the upper limit of the industrial range of 85-95% [3] (p. 358). Current efficiency loss was determined to be 2.8% per g/L of ferric ions, which agrees with Khouraibchia and Moats [27] 's empirical model of current efficiency (Equation ( 7)) and Schlesinger et al, [3] (p. 361)'s findings that current efficiency drops by approximately 2.5% for each addition of 1 g/L of ferric ions. where j is the current density.…”
Section: Electrowinning Of the Simulated Stripped Solutionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Considering the obtained Fe concentration of 1.4 g/L in the stripped solution, the expected current efficiency is approximately 95%, which is in the upper limit of the industrial range of 85-95% [3] (p. 358). Current efficiency loss was determined to be 2.8% per g/L of ferric ions, which agrees with Khouraibchia and Moats [27] 's empirical model of current efficiency (Equation ( 7)) and Schlesinger et al, [3] (p. 361)'s findings that current efficiency drops by approximately 2.5% for each addition of 1 g/L of ferric ions. where j is the current density.…”
Section: Electrowinning Of the Simulated Stripped Solutionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…4 (a) and (b) insets), indicating the complete removal of aqueous Cu. The results indicate that the initial concentration of Cu can influence the total removal efficiency significantly [23] and Ti/Ir-Ru electrode can be used as an anode for efficient removal of highly concentrated Cu in the wastewater owing to the enhanced physical and electrochemical properties as shown above.…”
Section: Electrowinning Process Using Ti/ir-ru Anodes Formentioning
confidence: 77%
“…The literature is robust with applications, optimizations, additives and developments in this field [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%