2008
DOI: 10.1002/uog.6138
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the effect of machine settings on quantitative three‐dimensional power Doppler angiography: an in‐vitro flow phantom experiment

Abstract: Objectives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
91
1
8

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 124 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(20 reference statements)
5
91
1
8
Order By: Relevance
“…This resemblance emphasizes the fact that 3D-PD indices are accurate and reproducible. Raine-Fenning et al (2008) as expected. The gain and signal power had the greatest effect followed by the PRF.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This resemblance emphasizes the fact that 3D-PD indices are accurate and reproducible. Raine-Fenning et al (2008) as expected. The gain and signal power had the greatest effect followed by the PRF.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The gain and signal power had the greatest effect followed by the PRF. Inspection of the figures in this article (Raine-Fenning et al, 2008) shows that an increase of the PRF from 0.5 to 1.0 was associated with decline of the VI from about 41 to 38% and more significant reduction of the VI was observed at PRF of 2.1. Most published data use a PRF of 0.6-0.9 a range with minimal effect on the VI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…We are still uncertain whether 3D power Doppler measurements truly reflect the vascularization and blood flow of the targeted region. Recent in vitro studies using a flow phantom experiment have explored this issue [11][12][13]. These studies have shown how VI, FI, and VFI indices are not equally related to the number of vessels and volume flow.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Doppler gain appears to be directly correlated with all the 3D power Doppler indices, and the use of higher gains may lead to false signals that could be interpreted as real blood flow (Figure 4a, b). Raine-Fenning et al (27) evaluated how different settings affect the Doppler signal in terms of its quantification by these three indices within a 3D dataset. They found that the gain and signal power have the greatest effect on the power Doppler signal, followed closely by the PRF.…”
Section: Limitations and Artifactsmentioning
confidence: 99%