2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.07.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the effect of different polishing systems on the surface roughness of dental ceramics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
31
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
31
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Surface roughness was measured using a 3D non-contact optical profilometer interference microscope, which has been shown to be preferable and more reliable in quantitative surface topographic analysis. It is also connected to a camera that captures a 3D surface texture image of the whole sample, resulting in a precise qualitative representation of the samples [30,31] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surface roughness was measured using a 3D non-contact optical profilometer interference microscope, which has been shown to be preferable and more reliable in quantitative surface topographic analysis. It is also connected to a camera that captures a 3D surface texture image of the whole sample, resulting in a precise qualitative representation of the samples [30,31] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies found that glazed groups and some polished groups exhibited similar surface roughness. Therefore, the polishing system did not have the same effect on all the ceramic systems [49][50][51]. It was noted the importance of considering the material structure when selecting a polishing method and that leucite content influences polish ability [52,53].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An increase in surface roughness above R a = 0.2 μm can substantially increase plaque accumulation with increase caries and periodontal inflammation 10 . Generally, it has been shown that hand polishing creates a smoother surface compared to oven glazing and is a better approach than reglazing a glazed surface requiring adjustment 16‐20 . One recent study concluded that surfaces of manually polished CAD/CAM ceramics are smoother compared to glazed feldspathic ceramics 21 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%