2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2019.112542
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the dopaminergic system with positron-emission tomography in alcohol abuse: A systematic review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, simplified methods have been developed to estimate surrogates of the BP. So-called reference tissue methods 119, 127131 do not require blood sampling but instead “compare” the time activity curve in the ROI to the time activity curve in a “reference” region in the brain [9, 10]. The reference region is assumed (i) to be void of the imaging target (e.g., the D2 receptor) and (ii) to show the same non-displaceable (by complete blocking of the target) tracer kinetics as the ROI [128, 132].…”
Section: Confounders Associated With Pet and Spect Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, simplified methods have been developed to estimate surrogates of the BP. So-called reference tissue methods 119, 127131 do not require blood sampling but instead “compare” the time activity curve in the ROI to the time activity curve in a “reference” region in the brain [9, 10]. The reference region is assumed (i) to be void of the imaging target (e.g., the D2 receptor) and (ii) to show the same non-displaceable (by complete blocking of the target) tracer kinetics as the ROI [128, 132].…”
Section: Confounders Associated With Pet and Spect Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NOS rates nonrandomized case-control studies using eight items categorized into the three following groups: (1) selection of study participants, (2) population comparability, and (3) verification as to whether exposure or outcome includes any risk of bias, selection bias, or bias of response rate between the groups. The NOS sum score ranges from 0 to 9, and studies with scores ≥7 are considered high quality [9]. The selection group comprises four items, with 0–1 point, respectively, leading to a maximum score of 4 points.…”
Section: Quality Assessment Of Included Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Addiction-related changes in the mesolimbic dopamine (DA) system may reflect acute DA release in the nucleus accumbens after, for example, alcohol consumption, leading to reward and consequently reinforcement of addiction-related behaviors [3,4]. In chronic alcohol abuse, reductions in striatal dopamine D2/3 receptor availability have been shown in several recent positron emission tomography (PET) studies and 2 recent metaanalyses [5,6]. Specifically, reductions were observed in the nucleus accumbens, the putamen and the caudate nucleus of alcohol use disorder (AUD) compared to healthy controls (HCs) and have been associated with several alcohol-related behaviors such as craving symptoms and increased relapse probabilities in AUD [7][8][9][10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chronic alcohol intake is associated with lower dopamine receptor availability. In particular, reduced availability of dopamine D2 and D3 receptors (DRD2 and DRD3, respectively) in the striatum of patients with alcohol dependence compared to healthy controls (HCs) has been demonstrated by several positron emission tomography (PET) studies (Erritzoe et al, 2014;Gleich et al, 2020;Heinz et al, 2004Heinz et al, , 2005Hietala et al, 1994;Rominger et al, 2012;Volkow et al, 2002Volkow et al, , 2007 and described in recent reviews (Alexandre et al, 2019;Kamp et al, 2018). However, it is unclear whether these changes reflect neuroadaptations to excess acute striatal dopamine release during regular substance use or are the result of genetic predisposition for substance use disorder.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%