2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3115(00)00383-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the deformation fields and bond integrity of Cu/SS joints

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The temperature stability was monitored throughout using a thermocouple consisting of copper and constantan wires percussion welded to the surface of the test piece. 4. ANALYSIS Three-dimensional nonlinear elastic-plastic FEA of the deformation behavior in the cracked and uncracked specimens was carried out using the commercial software MARC 2001.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The temperature stability was monitored throughout using a thermocouple consisting of copper and constantan wires percussion welded to the surface of the test piece. 4. ANALYSIS Three-dimensional nonlinear elastic-plastic FEA of the deformation behavior in the cracked and uncracked specimens was carried out using the commercial software MARC 2001.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interface strength is usually less than the ultimate tensile strength of the base materials, and failure typically occurs at the interface with varying amounts of material being detached on both sides [2,3]. This has been attributed to the existence of voids near the HIP interface [3] and the difference in the elastic moduli of the materials, which is responsible for shear stresses at the interface on loading [4,5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interface bonding strength will also play an important role in how the crack will behave as it approaches the interface, since low bonding interface strength can result in crack growth along the interface or delamination, adding additional complexities to the analysis [18][19][20][21][22]. In the present bimaterial systems, the existence of a strong interface bonding [23][24][25][26] facilitates understanding such systems.…”
Section: The Ms Was Received On 11 January 2002 and Was Accepted After Revision For Publication On 11 June 2002mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[15] Low interface bonding strength can result in crack growth along the interface or delamination, adding additional complexities to the analysis. [16][17][18][19][20] In the present bimaterial systems, the existence of strong interface bonding facilitates the investigation of such systems. [21][22][23][24][25] In the Al alloy/Al alloy ϩ SiC bimaterials (noting that both ys and E of the composite are increased, and ␣ is decreased, compared with the Al alloy), if the crack is in the composite side and close to the interface, the elastic/plastic mismatch is expected to increase K, while the near tip compressive residual stress is expected to have the opposite effect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%