2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2005.04.039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the Cosmetic Significance of External Dacryocystorhinostomy Scars

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
38
1
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
4
38
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…3,8 Cosmetically visible scar formation following Ex-DCR was reasonably low in our study (3/55 Ex-DCR; 5.45%, χ2=1.263) as compared to the published reports where visible scar formation ranges from 9-26%, hence this should not become a major issue and lone decisive factor while choosing for particular type of surgery ( Figure 5,6). 19,20 It is now an established fact that, surgical expertise in the field of DCR surgery may dramatically affect the surgical outcome. 21 Both the primary ophthalmic and ENT surgeon in our study are well versed in the nasolacrimal anatomy and in performing high volume DCR surgeries.…”
Section: 12mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3,8 Cosmetically visible scar formation following Ex-DCR was reasonably low in our study (3/55 Ex-DCR; 5.45%, χ2=1.263) as compared to the published reports where visible scar formation ranges from 9-26%, hence this should not become a major issue and lone decisive factor while choosing for particular type of surgery ( Figure 5,6). 19,20 It is now an established fact that, surgical expertise in the field of DCR surgery may dramatically affect the surgical outcome. 21 Both the primary ophthalmic and ENT surgeon in our study are well versed in the nasolacrimal anatomy and in performing high volume DCR surgeries.…”
Section: 12mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In revision cases especially when the bony ostium is of adequate size or failure is due to fibrosis at the osteotomy site can be also be managed with endoscopic DCR as an alternative to external DCR and are equally successful [13]. However, the disadvantages of endonasal DCR include the high cost of equipment and maintenance, the necessity to use general anesthesia that is preferred by most surgeons, a marked learning curve, difficulties in the treatment of other important causes of DCR failure like canalicular or common canalicular obstruction or sump syndrome [14].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our study 10 (37%) cases belong to such category (Table 2). Thus the presence of a cosmetic scar should not be the only guiding principle when deciding on the most appropriate route for operation for a particular patient [14]. The main aim of the surgeon while performing external DCR in traumatic dacryocystitis and failed DCR is to bypass the lower lacrimal system and to create a large ostium utilizing the medial wall of the sac and nasal mucosa.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been shown recently by our group that only a low percentage of adult patients (10.5%), felt the scarring to be cosmetically significant (41, on a scale of 1-5) following external DCR. 36 The average age of patients with a 'visible' scar was less than the average age of patients who reported an 'invisible' scar. Using the same scale, we found that for paediatric patients, there was a higher significance of the visibility of scarring noted by patients or their parents, as compared with the elderly group.…”
Section: Eyementioning
confidence: 99%
“…36 In the telephone interview, a low average visibility of scar for external DCR of 1.79 out of five, and a high average satisfaction rate of 4.53 out of five was found. It has been shown recently by our group that only a low percentage of adult patients (10.5%), felt the scarring to be cosmetically significant (41, on a scale of 1-5) following external DCR.…”
Section: Eyementioning
confidence: 99%