2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2016.04.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the correlation between wax type and structure/behavior of the pour point depressant

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
21
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
3
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This section first analyzes the pour point results promoted by the action of the unmodified EVA copolymers de EVA: EVA10, EVA9.7, and EVA6.5. As expected and reported in a previous study regarding model systems of commercial paraffins in toluene, the pour points of oils with low pour points were more easily reduced: the pour point of sample AP04 was reduced from +6 to −9 °C with the addition of only 100 ppm of EVA10. Also having a similar result to that obtained for the model system, the copolymer EVA10 presented the best performance.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This section first analyzes the pour point results promoted by the action of the unmodified EVA copolymers de EVA: EVA10, EVA9.7, and EVA6.5. As expected and reported in a previous study regarding model systems of commercial paraffins in toluene, the pour points of oils with low pour points were more easily reduced: the pour point of sample AP04 was reduced from +6 to −9 °C with the addition of only 100 ppm of EVA10. Also having a similar result to that obtained for the model system, the copolymer EVA10 presented the best performance.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…An interesting comparison can be made between samples EVA9.7(7.7VAc/0.4OH/1.6C10) and EVA10(8.0VAc/0.7OH/1.3C10), which differ in molar mass (EVA10 having higher molar mass than EVA9.7), as well as hydrolysis degree and content of C10 incorporated, since EVA10 has almost twice the hydrolysis content as EVA9.7. The modified EVA10, even though having a higher molar mass, as indicated by the results with the model paraffin systems that contributes to better performance, produced much less pronounced reductions in the pour point than the modified EVA9.7. This suggests that the reduction of the content of pendant hydrocarbon chains associated with an increase in the hydrophilic part diminishes the performance of the additive.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Majority of existing flow improvers are high molecular weight polymeric compounds [30]. However, high cost of pour point depressant formulations, selectivity of pour point depressants to crude oils and negative environmental impact of oil additives have led to increased interest in developing cheaper eco-friendly flow improvers [32,34,36].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%