Evaluation of the clinical impact of the differences between planned and delivered dose in prostate cancer radiotherapy based on CT‐on‐rails IGRT and patient‐reported outcome scores

Abstract

Purpose To estimate the clinical impact of differences between delivered and planned dose using dose metrics and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) modeling. Methods Forty‐six consecutive patients with prostate adenocarcinoma between 2010 and 2015 treated with intensity‐modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and who had undergone computed tomography on rails imaging were included. Delivered doses to bladder and rectum were estimated using a contour‐based deformable image registration method. The bladder and rectum NTCP were calculated using dose–response parameters applied to planned and delivered dose distributions. Seven urinary and gastrointestinal symptoms were prospectively collected using the validated prostate cancer symptom indices patient reported outcome (PRO) at pre‐treatment, weekly treatment, and post‐treatment follow‐up visits. Correlations between planned and delivered doses against PRO were evaluated in this study. Results Planned mean doses to bladder and rectum were 44.9 ± 13.6 Gy and 42.8 ± 7.3 Gy, while delivered doses were 46.1 ± 13.4 Gy and 41.3 ± 8.7 Gy, respectively. D 10cc for rectum was 64.1 ± 7.6 Gy for planned and 60.1 ± 9.3 Gy for delivered doses. NTCP values of treatment plan were 22.3% ± 8.4% and 12.6% ± 5.9%, while those for delivered doses were 23.2% ± 8.4% and 9.9% ± 8.3% for bladder and rectum, respectively. Seven of 25 patients with follow‐up data showed urinary complications (28%) and three had rectal complications (12%). Correlations of NTCP values of planned and delivered doses with PRO follow‐up data were random for bladder and moderate for rectum (0.68 and 0.67, respectively). Conclusion Sensitivity of bladder to clinical variations of dose accumulation indicates that an automated solution based on a DIR that considers inter‐fractional organ deformation could recommend intervention. This is intended to achieve additional rectum sparing in cases that indicate higher than expected dose accumulation early during patient treatment in order to prevent acute severity of bowel symptoms.