2001
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.1270
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the biocompatibility of a chitosan scaffold in mice

Abstract: Chitosan scaffolds appear to be suitable for a variety of tissue engineering applications. This study addressed the biocompatibility of chitosan in a mouse implantation model. Porous chitosan scaffolds were implanted in mice, and animals were sacrificed after 1, 2, 4, 8, or 12 weeks. Macroscopic inspection of the implantation site revealed no pathological inflammatory responses. Histological assessment indicated marked neutrophil accumulation within the implant, which resolved with increasing implantation time… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

17
398
1
9

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 672 publications
(438 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
17
398
1
9
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are in agreement with previous studies, indicating that chitosan improves the cell proliferation and induces no cytotoxic effects on the cells. 34,35 These results are promising for the determination of the biocompatibility of Chitosan and FAchitosan-coated NR-MSPs, crucial for their use in vivo, even though evaluation of the complete in vivo biocompatibility picture obviously is much more complex than what can be determined using cell viability assays. 36 (FACS) and confocal microscopy techniques.…”
Section: Cell Viabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results are in agreement with previous studies, indicating that chitosan improves the cell proliferation and induces no cytotoxic effects on the cells. 34,35 These results are promising for the determination of the biocompatibility of Chitosan and FAchitosan-coated NR-MSPs, crucial for their use in vivo, even though evaluation of the complete in vivo biocompatibility picture obviously is much more complex than what can be determined using cell viability assays. 36 (FACS) and confocal microscopy techniques.…”
Section: Cell Viabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scaffolds based on CH have been reported to display hydrophilic and cell adhesive/differentiating characteristics (VandeVord et al, 2002;Suh and Matthew, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8,9 No entanto, a biocompatibilidade de um material depende de diversos fatores inerentes ao organismo, como a espécie, a herança genética e o local de implantação ou ação, e ao material em si; e inerentes ao material que são a sua forma, tamanho, rugosidade e química de superfície, composição, morfologia, duração do contato com o organismo e degradação. Os polímeros naturais são geralmente biodegradáveis e possuem excelente biocompatibilidade quando comparados aos polímeros sintéticos.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified