2018
DOI: 10.1111/exsy.12261
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the benefits of using a backward chaining decision support expert system for local flood forecasting and warning

Abstract: Nationwide flood forecasting and warning are available through mass media. However, running the complex numerical models requires enormous computational resources. In addition, the comparatively low accuracy of prediction for a certain region such as a small town, a community, or a single house, causes false alarms and improper responses and thus the unnecessary loss of property and/or life. One potential solution to advance forecast accuracy without occupying substantial computational resources is to develop … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(39 reference statements)
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…How to quantify the performance of tunnels using the deterioration of these factors is open for discussion. A vast amount of research (Bui, Nguyen, Chou, Xuan, & Ngo, 2018; X. Y. Zhang, Moynihan, Ernest, & Gutenson, 2018) shows the effectiveness of expert systems in such complexity situation. We believe that expert systems have broad application prospects in evaluating the health condition of metro tunnels under the influence of multiple factors, before a more effective multifactor analysis method is developed, and thus, the expert‐based TSR system is adopted in this study.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…How to quantify the performance of tunnels using the deterioration of these factors is open for discussion. A vast amount of research (Bui, Nguyen, Chou, Xuan, & Ngo, 2018; X. Y. Zhang, Moynihan, Ernest, & Gutenson, 2018) shows the effectiveness of expert systems in such complexity situation. We believe that expert systems have broad application prospects in evaluating the health condition of metro tunnels under the influence of multiple factors, before a more effective multifactor analysis method is developed, and thus, the expert‐based TSR system is adopted in this study.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 29,37,38,48,[51][52][53][54][55] River or flood water, level observed [36,38,56] River or flood water, level forecasted [32,[57][58][59][60][61] Flood inundation extent Establish a spatial representation of floods to understand the impacted area.…”
Section: Intelligence On Flood Hazardsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[35,38,50,66,69,70,[76][77][78] Historical flood events and water level Understand inundation levels and impact caused by past flood events and extrapolate this knowledge to an emerging flood situation. [53,56,79] Flood propagation time/lead time Calculate lead time (travel time) of floods to plan early warnings, evacuation, and response, e.g., upstream to downstream or flood arrival time based on predicted or actual rainfall.…”
Section: Intelligence On Flood Hazardsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…"Knowledge Base and Presentation Layer" and the "Knowledge Processing Layer". For the sake of a proof of concept and exemplification, the architecture python knowledge engine (PyKE) has been used for the artificial intelligence in the system [46,47]. PyKE uses fact-bases and rule-bases as part of the knowledge base in the system with the expert system engine processes for bringing in the intelligence in the system.…”
Section: Smart Aaa Agent Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%