2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.126115
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the BCR sequential extraction scheme for trace metal fractionation of alkaline municipal solid waste incineration fly ash

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The chemical speciation of Al, Ba, Be, Cr, Cd, Cu, Fe, Ni, Pb, Sb, Sn, Tl and Zn in RCS fly ash and smelting slag were performed according to the three steps outlined in the Community Bureau of Reference (BCR) protocol of the European Standards Measurements and Testing Program, respectively. 31 The details are shown in Table A in the ESI. † After each step, the suspensions were filtered using a 0.45 μm microporous membrane and tested using ICPOES.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The chemical speciation of Al, Ba, Be, Cr, Cd, Cu, Fe, Ni, Pb, Sb, Sn, Tl and Zn in RCS fly ash and smelting slag were performed according to the three steps outlined in the Community Bureau of Reference (BCR) protocol of the European Standards Measurements and Testing Program, respectively. 31 The details are shown in Table A in the ESI. † After each step, the suspensions were filtered using a 0.45 μm microporous membrane and tested using ICPOES.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the formula, R ecological denotes the ecological risk of the sample; and C risk , C reducible , C oxidizable and C residual represent the risk value and reducible fraction, oxidizable fraction and residual fraction contents, respectively. The five classifications in MRAC include a safe level (less than 1%), low-risk level (1%-10%), medium-risk level (10%-30%), high-risk level (30%-50%) and very high-risk level (over 50%) (Jain, 2004;Tong et al, 2020).…”
Section: Evaluation Of Ecological Risk For Remediated Soilmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, a large number of sequential extraction schemes have been proposed. Each of them has advantages and limitations due to the non-selectivity of the reagents and incomplete extraction of chemical forms [10][11][12][13], the number of fractionation stages, duration of laboratory manipulations, sample-reagent ratio [14,15], redistribution of HMs between phases, and risk of cross-contamination [16,17]. A detailed analysis of the limitations of various schemes for sequential extraction of HMs has been provided in some works [18][19][20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike the A. Tessier et al scheme, a shorter set of chemical fractions is isolated by the BCR: F1acid-soluble (exchangeable and bound to carbonates), F2-reducible (bound to Fe/Mn oxides), F3-oxidizable (bound to organic matter and sulfides), F4-residual (metals within lithogenic minerals) fraction. BCR is also applied in some modifications to assess the ratio of HM forms in mangrove soils [47], soils in mining [9,48], industrial [49], and urban [5] areas; soils amended with waste composts or bio-sorbent materials [50,51]; airborne suspended particles [52]; river suspended sediments [53], soakaway sediments [54]; road dust in megacities [55], on various types of roads [56], and from industrial areas [57]; sewage sludge [58]; fly ash from wood biomass [59], and municipal waste incineration [10]; mining wastes [12], and ore-processing wastes [60]. For the sequential extraction of HMs from bottom sediments, the schemes according to M. Kersten and U. Förstner [61], H. Zeien and G.W.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%