2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2004.07.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of tests for antibodies against bovine herpesvirus 1 performed in national reference laboratories in Europe

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
48
0
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
5
48
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the presence of neutralizing antibodies in serum does not necessarily correlate with reduction of virus shedding or clinical protection in BoHV-1 vaccinated animals, induction of virus neutralizing antibodies is very often used to access immune responses to vaccination (Kramps et al 2004, Patel et al 2005, Silva et al 2007). The neutralizing antibody titers obtained after two doses of the inactivated 265gE -vaccine were higher than those detected after vaccination with one dose of the attenuated vaccine prepared with the same recombinant (Franco et al 2002a).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the presence of neutralizing antibodies in serum does not necessarily correlate with reduction of virus shedding or clinical protection in BoHV-1 vaccinated animals, induction of virus neutralizing antibodies is very often used to access immune responses to vaccination (Kramps et al 2004, Patel et al 2005, Silva et al 2007). The neutralizing antibody titers obtained after two doses of the inactivated 265gE -vaccine were higher than those detected after vaccination with one dose of the attenuated vaccine prepared with the same recombinant (Franco et al 2002a).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed the strength of the tool is fully dependent on the capacity of the diagnostic test at detecting BoHV-1 gE specific antibody. But the sensitivity of the only available gE specific ELISA is around 70% [97,160]. This rather low level of sensitivity is responsible for 30% false negative answers at individual tests but it remains sufficient to guarantee a high sensitivity at the level of infected herds.…”
Section: The Diva Strategy (Aiming At Differentiating Infected From Vmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This test detects serum antibodies both from vaccine and real infection. The sensitivity (Se) of the method is 95.4% and its specificity (Sp) is 99.0% (Kramps et al, 2004). The controls and cutoff values indicated by the manufacturer were used to score each serum sample as negative (< 45% inhibition) or positive (≥ 45% inhibition).…”
Section: Diagnostic Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Through eradication programmes, some European Union (EU) countries or regions have managed to reach the status of «IBR-free», and others are presently adopting control or eradication programmes. A third group of countries, including Spain, have no official specific IBR programme (Kramps et al, 2004;Borchers, 2006;Müller, 2006). Given that IBR appears in the World Organization for Animal Health list of bovine diseases and that European countries vary greatly in their IBR status, restrictions are now being imposed to the free circulation of animals and their products among the countries of the EU.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%