The quantitative formalin ethyl acetate concentration technique (QFEC) was compared to agar plate culture (APC) for the detection of Strongyloides stercoralis larvae. QFEC could substitute for APC only when the parasite load was higher than 50 larvae per g of stool. This study serves as a good reminder to those conducting stool exams about the sensitivity and specificity limitations of both techniques.Agar plate culture (APC) is a highly effective technique for the coprological diagnosis of human strongyloidiasis (1,(5)(6)(7)(8)10). But despite its high sensitivity, there are several disadvantages to APC. It is expensive, it takes a long time before results can be provided, and there is also a risk of infection for the technicians. The quantitative formalin ethyl acetate concentration technique (QFEC) is another effective and more rapid method to detect and quantify intestinal helminths, e.g., Ascaris lumbricoides (3) and Opisthorchis viverrini (4). In the present study, we compared APC results to the different intensities of Strongyloides stercoralis larvae determined by QFEC.Stool samples (n ϭ 1,233) were collected from populations in northeast Thailand and examined by APC (6) and QFEC (3). For APC, 3-g portions of individual fecal samples were placed in the centers of nutrient agar plates during the field survey. The plates were kept in a box and transported at room temperature (30 to 35°C) to the laboratory, where they were incubated for another 5 days at room temperature. The agar plates were examined under a stereomicroscope for the presence of tracks from moving larvae or free-living adults on the 3rd and 5th days. All microscopically positive dishes were further processed by washing the surface of the agar with a 10% formalin solution to collect worms for species identification. The differentiation of S. stercoralis larvae from hookworm larvae was performed under microscopic magnification of ϫ40. For QFEC, 2 g of individual fecal samples was weighed out and then stirred well in a vial containing a merthiolate-iodineformalin solution (2). The preserved stools were processed by QFEC (3). Briefly, the preserved fecal suspension was filtered through two layers of wet gauze into a centrifuge tube. The volume was adjusted to 10 ml with 10% formalin. Two milliliters of ethyl acetate was added, and the tube was closed and shaken for half a second. The stopper was removed, and the tube was centrifuged at 600 ϫ g for 10 min. The plug of debris along with the merthiolate-iodine-formalin solution was discarded by inverting the tube, leaving only the sediment, which was resuspended. The entire suspension was examined under a microscope. The total number of larvae in the sediment was counted and is presented as the number of larvae per gram of stool (lpg). A negative result meant that no larvae were seen in the whole sediment. This study protocol was approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee of Khon Kaen University.Of the 1,233 stool samples, 303 (24.57%) were found to be positive by at least one of the two meth...