1973
DOI: 10.1002/jps.2600620226
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Tablet Breaking Strength Testers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1974
1974
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…ODTs were prepared by direct compression [9,10] and evaluated for Hardness [11], weight variation [12], friability [13], content uniformity [14], disintegration time [15] and dissolution [16]. The % drug content was found in the range of 98.95 -101.21% (within the acceptable range) and the hardness was found between 3.94 -4.06 kg/cm 2 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ODTs were prepared by direct compression [9,10] and evaluated for Hardness [11], weight variation [12], friability [13], content uniformity [14], disintegration time [15] and dissolution [16]. The % drug content was found in the range of 98.95 -101.21% (within the acceptable range) and the hardness was found between 3.94 -4.06 kg/cm 2 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Brook and Marshall, 1968). Several variants of tablet hardness testers ranging from manual to automatic are currently being utilized (Bavitz et al, 1973;Fairchild and Michel, 1961;Goodhart et al, 1973;McCallum et al, 1955).…”
Section: Current Pharmacopeial/non-pharmacopeial Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly control tablets were compressed using pure drug instead of taste-masked microspheres. The fracture strength was measured with Monsanto tablet hardness tester[10]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%