2021
DOI: 10.11591/ijeecs.v21.i3.pp1731-1738
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of SVM performance in the detection of lung cancer in marked CT scan dataset

Abstract: <p>This paper concerns the development/analysis of the IQ-OTH/NCCD lung cancer dataset. This CT-scan dataset includes more than 1100 images of diagnosed healthy and tumorous chest scans collected in two Iraqi hospitals. A computer system is proposed for detecting lung cancer in the dataset by using image-processing/computer-vision techniques. This includes three preprocessing stages: image enhancement, image segmentation, and feature extraction techniques. Then, support vector machine (SVM) is used at th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On comparison with the recent works carried out using this same dataset, our model yields good results. With the same dataset work carried out using SVM classification, the accuracy achieved is 89.8876% [ 30 ]. In work carried out with the AlexNet architecture, accuracy is 93.548% [ 31 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On comparison with the recent works carried out using this same dataset, our model yields good results. With the same dataset work carried out using SVM classification, the accuracy achieved is 89.8876% [ 30 ]. In work carried out with the AlexNet architecture, accuracy is 93.548% [ 31 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DT classifier constantly splits the data conferring a certain parameter. Each node in the tree splits the data while the leaves represent the choices or the outcome decisions [34]. Resilient propagation (RPROP) is considered a robust machine learning scheme that adopts the local gradient information for the weight step [35], [36].…”
Section: Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CNN was used for classification without using any class balancing method and achieved 93.55 % accuracy, 95.71 % sensitivity, and 95 % specificity. The paper [11] used the same with the SVM classifier but the lowest class was neglected and was not included in the training. An accuracy of 89.88 % was achieved.…”
Section: Literature Review and Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%