2016
DOI: 10.1080/19315260.2016.1220438
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Substrate Components on Shiitake Mushroom Properties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the discussion of the obtained results, it's essential to contextualize them within existing literature to provide a comprehensive understanding. Consistent findings regarding the yield and biological efficiency of L. edodes (shiitake mushroom) across various substrates have been reported by several researchers [16,18,[23][24][25][26][27]. These studies, akin to our findings, have highlighted the significant influence of substrate choice on mushroom cultivation outcomes.…”
Section: Number Of Sporocarpssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In the discussion of the obtained results, it's essential to contextualize them within existing literature to provide a comprehensive understanding. Consistent findings regarding the yield and biological efficiency of L. edodes (shiitake mushroom) across various substrates have been reported by several researchers [16,18,[23][24][25][26][27]. These studies, akin to our findings, have highlighted the significant influence of substrate choice on mushroom cultivation outcomes.…”
Section: Number Of Sporocarpssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Therefore, these low levels of micronutrients from SSP may also contribute to the growth of mycelia. However, prior work has also found that higher levels of supplementation with shell powders can suppress or kill mycelia [23,24]. A previous report showed that the mycelial growth of Hypsizigus marmoreus slightly increased with the addition of CaCO 3 to a sawdust medium; however, mycelial growth was completely inhibited on potato sucrose agar medium supplemented with CaCO 3 [25].…”
Section: Influence Of Ssp Supplementation On the Growth Rate Of Myceliamentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, the BE was close to those obtained by Mata et al (2016) at 23.08% and higher than that obtained by Zied et al (2016) at 12.48. The compositions of the substrates are not limited to the C:N ratio; they provide a broad and complex nutritional complex (Ranjbar & Olfati, 2017;Dayani et al, 2018), and according to Xu et al (2020), to reach high BE, the C:N ratio must be as stable as possible, that is, no big difference from the initial C:N ratio of the substrate until the end of cultivation must occur. This is proven by Bach et al (2018), in which the difference of 2% from the initial C:N ratio to the end of cultivation in axenic blocks is beneficial to obtain the best productive responses.…”
Section: /7mentioning
confidence: 99%