1978
DOI: 10.1177/003754977803100303
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of startup policies in simulation experiments

Abstract: This paper describes a procedure for evaluating pro posed startup policies that define the initial condi tions and the truncation point in a simulation ex periment. The evaluation procedure involves the tabulation of bias, variance, and mean square error of the sample mean over a fixed range of truncation points and initial conditions. For each policy, the tabulated values are averaged with respect to an empirical truncation-point distribution based on independent model runs. These results are used to construc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
29
0
1

Year Published

1983
1983
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
2
29
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is a problem that has challenged the simulation community for many years. Among the papers that have addressed this question are [9], [12], [30], [31], and [23]; see also [11] and [19]. It is probably safe to say that no technique yet proposed satisfactorily solves this problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a problem that has challenged the simulation community for many years. Among the papers that have addressed this question are [9], [12], [30], [31], and [23]; see also [11] and [19]. It is probably safe to say that no technique yet proposed satisfactorily solves this problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gafarian et al (1978) and Wilson and Pritsker (1978a) review various truncation heuristics, and find that the methods available at that time are rather unsatisfactory. Wilson and Pritsker (1978b) state that choosing an initial state near the mode (rather than the mean) of the steadystate distribution produces favorable results. Another survey is provided by Chance (1993).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…For example, the crossing-of-the-mean rule (Fishman 1973, Wilson and Pritsker 1978a, 1978b was heavily criticised in the literature for being extremely sensitive to the selection of its main parameter, which was system-dependent, and misspecification of which caused significant over or under-estimation of the warm-up length (Pawlikowski 1990). This method was therefore rejected on ease of automation and accuracy grounds.…”
Section: < Figure 1 About Here>mentioning
confidence: 99%