SAE Technical Paper Series 2001
DOI: 10.4271/2001-01-0149
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Some Alternative Diesel Fuels for Low Emissions and Improved Fuel Economy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To increase the environmental compatibility of diesel engines, the U.S. Department of Energy (US DOE) has funded various studies to investigate the impact of fuel composition on the mitigation of particulate emissions by the use of alternate fuels. Recent developments in combustion fuel studies have cited benefits from Fischer−Tropsch (F−T) fuels and its blends as an alternative to reducing emissions resulting from diesel combustion. The characteristics of F−T fuels make them attractive as alternate diesel fuels, and has prompted the US DOE to initiate a rule to determine if F−T fuels should be designated as alternative fuels under the Energy Policy Act of 1992, which requires that the fuels provide “substantial environmental benefits”…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To increase the environmental compatibility of diesel engines, the U.S. Department of Energy (US DOE) has funded various studies to investigate the impact of fuel composition on the mitigation of particulate emissions by the use of alternate fuels. Recent developments in combustion fuel studies have cited benefits from Fischer−Tropsch (F−T) fuels and its blends as an alternative to reducing emissions resulting from diesel combustion. The characteristics of F−T fuels make them attractive as alternate diesel fuels, and has prompted the US DOE to initiate a rule to determine if F−T fuels should be designated as alternative fuels under the Energy Policy Act of 1992, which requires that the fuels provide “substantial environmental benefits”…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the blending of OME1 led to increased THC and CO emissions. In a similar experiment, Gardner et al [108] observed a 5-10% increase in brake-specific fuel consumption (BSFC) due to the lower LHV of OME1.…”
Section: Oxymethylene Dimethyl Ethers As Alternativementioning
confidence: 90%