2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jds.2011.03.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of soft-tissue artifacts when using anatomical and technical markers to measure mandibular motion

Abstract: Background/purpose: Skin marker-based systems are used to accurately measure the three-dimensional motion of the temporomandibular joint. Since skin markers move relative to the underlying bone during jaw movements, the measured temporomandibular joint kinematics is subject to soft-tissue artifacts. A complete evaluation of soft-tissue artifacts for markers on the facial anatomical landmarks and on an optical frame during jaw opening/closing movements is not available. The purpose of this study was to further … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proposed method was shown to have measurement errors less than 1.0¡1.4 mm for all translations and 0.2 u ¡0.7 u for all rotations, much smaller than previously published errors associated with skin marker movement artefacts using non-contact techniques. 12 These results suggest that the method can be used to measure the in vivo kinematics of the mandible during functional activities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The proposed method was shown to have measurement errors less than 1.0¡1.4 mm for all translations and 0.2 u ¡0.7 u for all rotations, much smaller than previously published errors associated with skin marker movement artefacts using non-contact techniques. 12 These results suggest that the method can be used to measure the in vivo kinematics of the mandible during functional activities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Therefore, studies have suggested to replace oral piercing device with the reference frames [21] . For which, frontonosal reference points, with the most less movement among reference points on soft tissue, are the most favorable to be used for replacing the locations with oral piercing device to position markers and to observe mandibular movements in patients with TMJ disorders [22] . The advances in the resolution and precision techniques in conebeam computed tomography (CBCT) have gradually enhanced the use of CBCT in studies involving mandibular movements.…”
Section: Differences In the References Points Between Hard And Soft Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…24,25 For more widespread application of these systems, techniques using commercially available skin-marker-based stereophotogrammetric systems were also developed. In order to avoid skin-movement artifacts, i.e., errors associated with skin-marker movements relative to the underlying bones, 26 transoral devices are used. However, transoral devices may affect the natural motion of the TMJ, which will be negatively affected if the participant was asked to perform other more natural, clinically relevant movements, such as chewing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%