2016
DOI: 10.1111/srt.12314
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of skin firmness by the DynaSKIN, a novel non‐contact compression device, and its use in revealing the efficacy of a skincare regimen featuring a novel anti‐ageing ingredient, acetyl aspartic acid

Abstract: The DynaSKIN is a novel device capable of capturing skin biomechanics at a high level of specificity and successfully detected the firming properties of a skincare regimen. Its independent measuring principle, consumer relevance and skin firmness 3D visualisation capabilities bring objectivity and novelty to product efficacy substantiation evaluation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The increase in firmness demonstrated by L4 is the observable clinical benefit of an improved epidermal and dermal structure. Kearney et al [34] investigated changes in firmness of an anti‐ageing ingredient after 12 weeks and showed a similar decrease in maximum depth seen from the base formula and L4 treatment, about 11% after 1 weeks. Interestingly, the anti‐ageing ingredient tested in Kearney et al had a decrease in volume versus baseline of 13% after 4 weeks and 14% after 12 weeks, where L4‐treated skin had a significant decrease of 15% in a 4‐week period versus baseline (8% for the base formula, p = 0.08 vs. L4 treated), further supporting the efficacy of L4 in functional clinical assessments in relatively short‐term studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The increase in firmness demonstrated by L4 is the observable clinical benefit of an improved epidermal and dermal structure. Kearney et al [34] investigated changes in firmness of an anti‐ageing ingredient after 12 weeks and showed a similar decrease in maximum depth seen from the base formula and L4 treatment, about 11% after 1 weeks. Interestingly, the anti‐ageing ingredient tested in Kearney et al had a decrease in volume versus baseline of 13% after 4 weeks and 14% after 12 weeks, where L4‐treated skin had a significant decrease of 15% in a 4‐week period versus baseline (8% for the base formula, p = 0.08 vs. L4 treated), further supporting the efficacy of L4 in functional clinical assessments in relatively short‐term studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The system measures firmness of the skin (cheek) by blowing gentle air perpendicular to the skin surface and transforming the deformation information into a 3D map of the skin surface. This technique provides qualitative and quantitative data for real tactile perception of firmness and laxity of the skin and its sag via its measurement of depth, surface and volume of the skin deformation [34]. DynaSKIN measures firmness as the correlation of the size of the skin's maximum resistance to an applied force, which can provide a quantitative measure of skin structural integrity and a consumer-relevant measure, as it mirrors the way consumers judge firmness on their own skin, by pushing or pressing on the skin surface [34,35].…”
Section: Firming Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These were the upper and lower eyelids, upper cheek, lower cheek, and jowls. Skin firmness is often judged by the tactile motion of pushing or pressing of the skin 10 . In this study, the participants were seated in front of a mirror and facial skin firmness was determined by using their fingertips to press on the facial regions; facial puffiness was assessed visually.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Skin firmness was assessed using the DynaSKIN device by Eotech SA, Marcoussis, France (Kearney et al 2017). In this method an air stream is blown perpendicularly onto a defined spot on the cheeks of the volunteers causing a skin deformation.…”
Section: Clinical Test Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%