1997
DOI: 10.1007/s11663-997-0098-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of six k-ε turbulence model predictions of flow in a continuous casting billet-mold water model using laser doppler velocimetry measurements

Abstract: Quantitative fluid velocity and turbulence measurements, which were obtained using laser Doppler velocimetry (LDV) during the course of the physical modeling of the molten steel flow in a continuous casting billet mold, are presented. The experimental findings are compared to the results obtained by the computational simulation of the flow using the high-Reynolds-number and five lowReynolds-number k-ε turbulence models. The predictive capabilities of these turbulence models were assessed in comparison to the e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The TurboSwirl was immersed into an overflow tank (Overflow tank 2), which is a transparent square plexiglass container that was used to eliminate the boundary curvature effect when using a camera to record the swirling flow and air-core vortex inside the TurboSwirl. 17) In order to investigate the swirling flow of the TurboSwirl, a steadystate condition should be gained inside the vertical runner, so the mold, which was supposed to be placed on top of the TurboSwirl, was not included in this water model experiment. Furthermore, if an excessive amount of water submerged the outlet of the TurboSwirl, the pressure and velocity profile were not compatible with the reality, so the pressure gauge of the outlet of the TurboSwirl was kept at a zero value.…”
Section: Water Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The TurboSwirl was immersed into an overflow tank (Overflow tank 2), which is a transparent square plexiglass container that was used to eliminate the boundary curvature effect when using a camera to record the swirling flow and air-core vortex inside the TurboSwirl. 17) In order to investigate the swirling flow of the TurboSwirl, a steadystate condition should be gained inside the vertical runner, so the mold, which was supposed to be placed on top of the TurboSwirl, was not included in this water model experiment. Furthermore, if an excessive amount of water submerged the outlet of the TurboSwirl, the pressure and velocity profile were not compatible with the reality, so the pressure gauge of the outlet of the TurboSwirl was kept at a zero value.…”
Section: Water Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…31) It is critically important to validate models with experimental measurement. Several methods have been employed to measure the fluid flow velocity vectors in continuous casting mold system, including LDV (Laser Doppler Velocimetry) for mold 16,57) and for SEN nozzle 58,59) ), PIV (Particle Image Velocimetry), 19,25,60,61) hot wire anemometry 62) ; and propeller flow meters. [63][64][65] Figure 3 compares the instantaneous flow patterns predicted using physical and mathematical models for a typical double-roll flow pattern condition.…”
Section: Flow In the Moldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] Fewer publications related with fluid flow in billet molds and particle image velocimetry (PIV) measurements are available, [11][12][13][14][15] probably because the conventional straight nozzles employed in this field work in a much more confined space, inducing what would be called standard flows with small variations of fluid flow patterns. However, the study presented here made clear that the complex nature of turbulent flows prevails even under the conditions of very stable flows, such as those expected in billet molds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%