2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2004.02470.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of six commercial identification kits for the identification of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from bovine mastitis

Abstract: Aims:  Comparison of six commercially available in human medicine well‐established slide agglutination systems for the identification of Staphylococcus aureus. Methods and Results:  Slide agglutination tests were compared with the conventional tube coagulase test, biochemical identification and with the molecular identification by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification of species‐specific parts of the gene encoding the 23S RNA. Systems evaluated included Masta‐Staph® (Mast Diagnostics), Staphylase‐Test®… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(20 reference statements)
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Only 5 strains isolated from cow mastitis failed in the test. Similar to our results are the findings of Zschöck et al (29) who evaluated 6 commercial agglutination kits for S. aureus detection in bovine mastitis. The authors conclude that slide agglutination methods can provide rapid identification of S. aureus from bovine mastitis as well, however the sensitivity and specificity of these tests is lower than those reported for human isolates.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Only 5 strains isolated from cow mastitis failed in the test. Similar to our results are the findings of Zschöck et al (29) who evaluated 6 commercial agglutination kits for S. aureus detection in bovine mastitis. The authors conclude that slide agglutination methods can provide rapid identification of S. aureus from bovine mastitis as well, however the sensitivity and specificity of these tests is lower than those reported for human isolates.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…A latex agglutination test that detects PBP2a, the penicillin-binding protein that mediates methicillin resistance, and nucleic acid amplification methods to detect mecA , the gene encoding PBP2a, are also available. 105107 A detailed discussion of the advantages and disadvantages of these various methods is beyond the scope of this article, except to note that sensitivity and specificity of any single test is about 95%, no test is perfect, and most clinical laboratories perform confirmatory testing. Presently, the only way to determine susceptibility to non-beta-lactam antibiotics is by standard susceptibility testing.…”
Section: Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, the specificity and sensitivity of this diagnostic test depend on the presence and proper function of the above-mentioned proteins on the surface of S. aureus. Some studies have reported low sensitivities and specificities for bovine S. aureus detection with latex agglutination-based tests, but the possible reasons for such observations have not yet been examined (35,45).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%