2015
DOI: 10.3233/ifs-151977
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of scientific publications with hesitant fuzzy uncertain linguistic and semantic information

Abstract: Abstract. Scientific and technological papers play a fundamental role in the scientific and technological innovation of countries. The quality control of scientific and technological articles is vital to the journals and management of personnel. This paper investigates multiple attribute decision-making problems with the application of hesitant fuzzy uncertain linguistic information. Motivated by the ideal traditional I-COA operator, an induced hesitant fuzzy uncertain linguistic correlated averaging (IHFULCA)… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In traditional decision-making methods, ranking the alternatives were just based on decision maker's opinion with some crisp data, but in real case problems are vague and fuzzy environmental is needed to solve the problem [19][20][21]. This proposed model aims to help decision makers by using fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS for selecting suppliers.…”
Section: Fig1 Supply Chain Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In traditional decision-making methods, ranking the alternatives were just based on decision maker's opinion with some crisp data, but in real case problems are vague and fuzzy environmental is needed to solve the problem [19][20][21]. This proposed model aims to help decision makers by using fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS for selecting suppliers.…”
Section: Fig1 Supply Chain Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…there is no way of ensuring that scoring rules and standards are being applied the same way by different raters or in the same exact way by a particular teacher. The disadvantage of a peer review, as a common academic evaluation method, was also pointed out (Xu et al, 2015).…”
Section: Tab 3 Comparison Between Classical and Defuzzification Marmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Induced hesitant fuzzy uncertain linguistic correlated averaging was proposed in evaluation of scientific publications (Xu et al, 2015). Some other possibilities for the evaluation of faculty teachers' work are present (Pavlović, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%