2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2018.01.115
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of renewable power sources using a fuzzy MCDM based on cumulative prospect theory: A case in China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
87
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 231 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
87
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a comprehensive assessment system, both quantitative and qualitative criteria may be involved in, where the data of the qualitative criteria are contributed by experts’ descriptions, while that of the quantitative ones might be collected from related literature, or calculated by specific simulations/software. Usually, the real‐world decision‐making issues would be composited by different types of data, that is, using the crisp values or interval numbers to represent the data of the quantitative criteria and employing the linguistic terms corresponding to scales or fuzzy numbers to measure the data of the qualitative ones; meanwhile, the aleatory uncertainty (such as variations or randomness) in quantitative data and the epistemic uncertainty (such as lack of knowledge/information on parameterization) in qualitative data should also be considered . Since both the crisp and interval values can be converted into the triangular fuzzy numbers as given in Equation , while any TFN could also be defuzzified into the crisp number as shown in Equation , the TFN was used in this study to deal with the hybrid information according to the suggestions in the MADM‐based works, and the numerical properties and operational laws of the triangular fuzzy numbers are offered in the Supporting Information .{afalse→truea~=)(al,am,au=)(a,a,a)(normalfor0.166667em0.166667emnormalcrisp0.166667em0.166667emnormalnumber][a,trueafalse¯false→truea~=)(al,am,au=)(a,)(a+trueafalse¯false/2,trueafalse¯)(normalfor0.166667em0.166667emnormalinterval0.166667em0.166667emnormalnumbersa=Defuzzified(afalse~)=al+4am+au/6…”
Section: Mathematical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a comprehensive assessment system, both quantitative and qualitative criteria may be involved in, where the data of the qualitative criteria are contributed by experts’ descriptions, while that of the quantitative ones might be collected from related literature, or calculated by specific simulations/software. Usually, the real‐world decision‐making issues would be composited by different types of data, that is, using the crisp values or interval numbers to represent the data of the quantitative criteria and employing the linguistic terms corresponding to scales or fuzzy numbers to measure the data of the qualitative ones; meanwhile, the aleatory uncertainty (such as variations or randomness) in quantitative data and the epistemic uncertainty (such as lack of knowledge/information on parameterization) in qualitative data should also be considered . Since both the crisp and interval values can be converted into the triangular fuzzy numbers as given in Equation , while any TFN could also be defuzzified into the crisp number as shown in Equation , the TFN was used in this study to deal with the hybrid information according to the suggestions in the MADM‐based works, and the numerical properties and operational laws of the triangular fuzzy numbers are offered in the Supporting Information .{afalse→truea~=)(al,am,au=)(a,a,a)(normalfor0.166667em0.166667emnormalcrisp0.166667em0.166667emnormalnumber][a,trueafalse¯false→truea~=)(al,am,au=)(a,)(a+trueafalse¯false/2,trueafalse¯)(normalfor0.166667em0.166667emnormalinterval0.166667em0.166667emnormalnumbersa=Defuzzified(afalse~)=al+4am+au/6…”
Section: Mathematical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Step 4: Decision-making based on prospect theory When the prospect theory is applied, the reference point becomes a crucial factor in decision-making. In this condition, the reference points are generally chosen from the following key points: zero-point; mean value; maximum value and minimum value [51]. Let S = S 1 , S 2 , .…”
Section: The Computational Step Of the Fuzzy Mcdm Model Based On Prosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Step 4.1: Determine the positive ideal solution (PIS) and the negative ideal solution (NIS) of all alternatives under each criterion are set as [51]…”
Section: The Computational Step Of the Fuzzy Mcdm Model Based On Prosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…General research of these parameters can ensure optimal research results.Experimental research with various fuels and different engine tuning parameters yields a multi-criteria problem which can be solved applying multicriteria decision-making methods (MCDM) methods. The MCDM analysis is often used to address multiple technical issues, for example, for the assessment and selection of renewable energy technologies [44][45][46][47], development of biomass technologies [48], ecological building assessment [49], reduction potential [50], to evaluate various failure modes more precisely [51], etc. Using the step-wise weight assessment ratio analysis (SWARA) method, the evaluation factors affecting electronic learning [52] logistics [53,54], employee selection [55], and logistic provider selection [56] were analyzed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%