2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.acalib.2007.01.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Reference Services—A Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the US Census (2005), 55 percent of the households had Internet access in 2003. With the rapid rise of Internet use, a Web‐based survey is becoming more commonly utilized for data collection for social science research (Kuruppu, 2007). Web‐based data collection is a cost‐effective and time‐efficient alternative to traditional methods (e.g., mail survey) because it eliminates data entry errors and both publishing and distribution costs, and ensures quick responses and at the same time increasing accessibility (Kaplowitz, Hadlock, & Levine, 2004; Kuruppu, 2007; Miller et al., 2002).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…According to the US Census (2005), 55 percent of the households had Internet access in 2003. With the rapid rise of Internet use, a Web‐based survey is becoming more commonly utilized for data collection for social science research (Kuruppu, 2007). Web‐based data collection is a cost‐effective and time‐efficient alternative to traditional methods (e.g., mail survey) because it eliminates data entry errors and both publishing and distribution costs, and ensures quick responses and at the same time increasing accessibility (Kaplowitz, Hadlock, & Levine, 2004; Kuruppu, 2007; Miller et al., 2002).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the rapid rise of Internet use, a Web‐based survey is becoming more commonly utilized for data collection for social science research (Kuruppu, 2007). Web‐based data collection is a cost‐effective and time‐efficient alternative to traditional methods (e.g., mail survey) because it eliminates data entry errors and both publishing and distribution costs, and ensures quick responses and at the same time increasing accessibility (Kaplowitz, Hadlock, & Levine, 2004; Kuruppu, 2007; Miller et al., 2002). In addition, a Web survey can yield as effective a response rate as a mail survey and more detailed qualitative answers than a mail survey (Kaplowitz et al., 2004; Kiernan, Kiernan, Oyler, & Gilles, 2005).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…La técnica de focus groups se empleó para conocer la opinión de los usuarios sobre la evaluación de los SRV, contribuyendo a la participación y el intercambio de experiencias en el grupo (Whitlatch, 2001 de obtener información sobre experiencias, pensamientos, preocupaciones y valores de los usuarios (Kuruppu, 2007).…”
Section: Metodologíaunclassified
“…As mentioned earlier, in obtrusive evaluation from the user perspective, survey, interview and focus groups are often employed, among which survey is the most popular. Kuruppu (2007) reviewed the literature on reference evaluation methodologies and discussed how each of the three methods, among others, should be used in evaluating reference services. For instance, when discussing the survey method, Kuruppu (2007) covered issues such as survey modality, response rate, the selection of a representative sample, the use of scales, exemplar studies, established instruments , and the inherent weakness of this method.…”
Section: Methodologies For User-oriented Reference Service Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%