1973
DOI: 10.1148/109.2.297
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve Data in Terms of Information Theory, with Applications in Radiography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
98
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 209 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
98
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2, individual relative ERCC1 expression levels were blotted against the respective regression grades, and in Table 2, absolute and relative ERCC1 mRNA expression levels are shown with the respective response grades for each individual patient. Cutoff values (21) for ERCC1 expression and histopathological response were calculated for an expression level of 1.09 (area under the curve, 0.74; 95% confidence interval, 0.58 -0.89) to identify minor histopathological response to neoadjuvant therapy.…”
Section: Ercc1 and Response To Therapy In Esophageal Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2, individual relative ERCC1 expression levels were blotted against the respective regression grades, and in Table 2, absolute and relative ERCC1 mRNA expression levels are shown with the respective response grades for each individual patient. Cutoff values (21) for ERCC1 expression and histopathological response were calculated for an expression level of 1.09 (area under the curve, 0.74; 95% confidence interval, 0.58 -0.89) to identify minor histopathological response to neoadjuvant therapy.…”
Section: Ercc1 and Response To Therapy In Esophageal Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As we described above, the model was found dividing the database in training and CV series (subsampling test). A jackknife validation procedure was carried out in the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve for the model was also calculated (Diamond, 1987;Hanley, 1989;Mann et al, 1992;Metz et al, 1973). The fraction of true positives (Sensitivity) is contrasted with the fraction of false positives (1-Specificity) in this type of curves.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difference between the a priori uncertainty and the expected value of the a posteriori uncertainty gives the gain in information provided by the diagnostic test. It is referred to as the diagnostic information or IC of the diagnostic test (4)(5)(6). This difference is also called mutual information.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Metz et al (5) introduced the equation for IC for the binary case in terms of the sensitivity and specificity of the test. Benish (4) provided the expression for IC for the more general case as follows:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%