2020
DOI: 10.1186/s40068-020-00186-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of reanalysis and global meteorological products in Beas river basin of North-Western Himalaya

Abstract: It is a great challenge to obtain reliable gridded meteorological data in some data-scarce and complex territories like the Himalaya region. Less dense observed raingauge data are unable to represent rainfall variability in the Beas river basin of North-Western Himalaya. In this study four reanalyses (MERRA, ERA-Interim, JRA-55 and CFSR) and one global meteorological forcing data WFDEI have been used to evaluate the potential of the products to represent orographic rainfall pattern of Beas river basin using hy… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 95 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Generally, the reanalysis data are subject to high uncertainty because of the coarse spatial resolution and assimilation of limited observation [49][50][51]. Therefore, before using in further analysis, consistency check between reanalysis and observation data could provide a basic evaluation for the reliability of both datasets [4,50,51].…”
Section: Relationship Between Observation and Reanalysis Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Generally, the reanalysis data are subject to high uncertainty because of the coarse spatial resolution and assimilation of limited observation [49][50][51]. Therefore, before using in further analysis, consistency check between reanalysis and observation data could provide a basic evaluation for the reliability of both datasets [4,50,51].…”
Section: Relationship Between Observation and Reanalysis Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, the reanalysis data are subject to high uncertainty because of the coarse spatial resolution and assimilation of limited observation [49][50][51]. Therefore, before using in further analysis, consistency check between reanalysis and observation data could provide a basic evaluation for the reliability of both datasets [4,50,51]. In the present study, the mean annual cycles of temperature variables (annual mean, maximum and minimum temperatures) were evaluated and correlations between the ERA5 reanalysis data and the observed data at individual stations were analyzed (Figure 3).…”
Section: Relationship Between Observation and Reanalysis Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is therefore important to compare datasets from different sources and different providers. A number of such comparisons exist already, but they are typically either focused mostly on observational data (e.g., [2]), include only selected reanalysis and observational datasets (e.g., [18][19][20]), concentrate on specific continental regions such as, for example, the continental U.S. [21], North-Western Himalaya [22], or a river basin in China [23], or focus on selected ocean basins (e.g., the Southern Ocean [24]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, due to the sparse distribution of rain gauge networks in the Baro-Akobo basin, a pixel-to-point approach was used to compare gridded RCM data against point rainfall data of the rain gauge observations. Findings in (Bhattacharya and Khare 2020) show that point to pixel approach comparison of observed data with gridded climate data has resulted in good agreement in the Beas River basin of Northwestern Himalaya.…”
Section: Observed Climate Datamentioning
confidence: 95%