2012
DOI: 10.1007/s10549-012-1998-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of RAD51C as cancer susceptibility gene in a large breast-ovarian cancer patient population referred for genetic testing

Abstract: Despite extensive analysis of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes, germline mutations are detected in <20% of families with a presumed genetic predisposition for breast and ovarian cancer. Recent literature reported RAD51C as a new breast cancer susceptibility gene. In this study, we report the analysis of 410 patients from 351 unrelated pedigrees. All were referred for genetic testing and we selected families with at least one reported case of ovarian cancer in which BRCA1&2 mutations were previously ruled out. We anal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
11
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Several studies from various countries and ethnic groups have attempted to confirm these findings. Eleven studies have reported mutations with varying frequencies (0.4 -2.9%; summarized in table 1) [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24], but eight studies failed to detect any clearly pathogenic mutation [25][26][27][28][29][30][31]. Of all families with an identified mutation in the 11 studies, only one mutation was found in a family without ovarian cancer (prevalence 0.2%) [18,21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies from various countries and ethnic groups have attempted to confirm these findings. Eleven studies have reported mutations with varying frequencies (0.4 -2.9%; summarized in table 1) [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24], but eight studies failed to detect any clearly pathogenic mutation [25][26][27][28][29][30][31]. Of all families with an identified mutation in the 11 studies, only one mutation was found in a family without ovarian cancer (prevalence 0.2%) [18,21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evaluaron 277 pacientes con cáncer familiar de mama/ovario, donde reportan la mutación en el 2% de las familias con cáncer mama/ovario (23 Por otro lado, Lu y cols en el 2012, reportan un estudio de cohorte, donde se analizan los resultados del análisis mutacional de RAD51C en 192 familias con alto riesgo de carcinoma mama y/u ovario; este estudio no logró identificar ninguna mutación, atribuyendo este resultado al número limitado de familias con cáncer de mama y ovario (n=35) (24). Para los artículos de calidad aceptable, cuatro no mostraron una relación directa entre la mutación del gen y la enfermedad (25)(26)(27)(28), los restantes encontraron mutaciones en las familias con carcinoma de mama y ovario, pero no en los casos exclusivos de carcinoma de mama (11,(19)(20)(21)(22)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34), relacionando la presencia de mutaciones en los casos con historia familiar de por lo menos un caso de carcinoma de ovario: OR: 13,59; IC95% 1,89-97,6; p=0,026 en los casos de cáncer familiar de mama y ovario, y OR: 213; IC95% 25,6-1769; p=0,0002 en casos de cáncer familiar de ovario en ausencia de cáncer de mama (23).…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
“…Caracterización de la población estudiada. Los 17 artículos incluidos y revisados, incluyeron poblaciones de diversas etnias; Finlandia (22,23,28,33), Estados Unidos (24,27,30,34), España (19,31), Reino Unido (21), Alemania (11), Australia (32), Francia (20), Israel (26), Canadá, Bélgica y Países bajos (25). Esta diversidad poblacional, se plantea como la causa principal del amplio rango de prevalencias reportada.…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite the initial scienti fi c and clinical support for RAD51C as a cancer susceptibility gene, others have not found a high prevalence of RAD51C mutations in at-risk breast-ovarian cancer cohorts [ 38 ] or may not be as highly penetrant as has been demonstrated in some studies [ 39 ] . As the actual frequency of RAD51C has not yet been precisely delineated as well as the effect of the various identi fi ed germline mutations on the risk of breast and ovarian cancers in women and men carrying such mutations, further studies are needed in order to determine whether RAD51C should be included in a universal or targeted genetic screening panel for women with family histories of breast and ovarian cancer.…”
Section: Rad51cmentioning
confidence: 98%