2015
DOI: 10.1111/cge.12548
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic testing for RAD51C mutations: in the clinic and community

Abstract: Much of the observed familial clustering of breast and ovarian cancer cannot be explained by mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2. Several other cancer susceptibility genes have been identified, but their value in routine clinical genetic testing is still unclear. Germline mutations in RAD51C have been identified in about 1% of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer families. RAD51C mutations are predominantly found in families with a history of ovarian cancer and are rare in families with a history of breast cancer alo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
23
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
2
23
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We also suggest prophylactic salpingo-oophorectomy for menopausal carrier women in ovarian cancer families with RAD51C and RAD51D PVs as ORs conferred by PVs detected within these genes are comparable to those conferred by BRCA2 PVs. 15,[30][31][32] We also confirmed the moderate cancer risks induced by CHEK2 and BRIP1 PVs. However, considering the moderate ORs for breast cancer conferred by CHEK2 PVs (1.77 [1.20-2.48]), and for ovarian cancer induced by BRIP1 PVs 3.82 [1.66-7.11], it appears inappropriate to base clinical management on these variants.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…We also suggest prophylactic salpingo-oophorectomy for menopausal carrier women in ovarian cancer families with RAD51C and RAD51D PVs as ORs conferred by PVs detected within these genes are comparable to those conferred by BRCA2 PVs. 15,[30][31][32] We also confirmed the moderate cancer risks induced by CHEK2 and BRIP1 PVs. However, considering the moderate ORs for breast cancer conferred by CHEK2 PVs (1.77 [1.20-2.48]), and for ovarian cancer induced by BRIP1 PVs 3.82 [1.66-7.11], it appears inappropriate to base clinical management on these variants.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…They demonstrated that these mutations are detected in 1.3% of probands with family history of both breast and ovarian cancer, but not in probands with family history of only breast cancer. (19) Similarly, most deleterious mutations were identified in families of patients with both breast and ovarian cancer, (20)(21)(22) although a few cases were identified in a family including only patients with breast cancer. (23)(24)(25) In addition, Osorio et al reported that the prevalence of RAD51C mutation in a family of patients with ovarian cancer was 1%, while the value in a family including only patients with breast cancer was 0.2%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to defects in BRCA1 or 2, cancer genome sequencing revealed mutations in many other HR pathway components that promote oncogenesis, including PALB2 (112), BRCA1-interacting protein 1 ( BRIP1 ; also termed FANCJ and BACH1 ) (113), BARD1 (114), BAP1 (115) and RAD51C (116). This expansion of HR driver mutations should broaden the clinical application of PARP1 inhibitors (117).…”
Section: Drugging Hr and Crosslink Repairmentioning
confidence: 99%