2010
DOI: 10.1128/jcm.00645-10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis Profiles for Identification of Salmonella Serotypes

Abstract: Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) is a standard typing method for isolates from Salmonella outbreaks and epidemiological investigations. Eight hundred sixty-six Salmonella enterica isolates from eight serotypes, including Heidelberg (n ‫؍‬ 323), Javiana (n ‫؍‬ 200), Typhimurium (n ‫؍‬ 163), Newport (n ‫؍‬ 93), Enteritidis (n ‫؍‬ 45), Dublin (n ‫؍‬ 25), Pullorum (n ‫؍‬ 9), and Choleraesuis (n ‫؍‬ 8), were subjected to PFGE, and their profiles were analyzed by random forest classification and compared to c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(18 reference statements)
0
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For banding-pattern-based subtyping methods, the ability to correctly predict serovars ranged from 65% to 76% for isolates representing the 40 most common Salmonella serovars, and by comparison, MLST correctly predicted the serovars of 91% of these isolates. Previous studies typically only tested the ability of one or a few subtyping methods to predict serovars in isolates representing limited diversity and a small number of serovars (19,21,22,(46)(47)(48). For example, Gaul et al (47) compared one banding-pattern method, PFGE, to traditional serotyping on a collection of 674 swine Salmonella isolates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For banding-pattern-based subtyping methods, the ability to correctly predict serovars ranged from 65% to 76% for isolates representing the 40 most common Salmonella serovars, and by comparison, MLST correctly predicted the serovars of 91% of these isolates. Previous studies typically only tested the ability of one or a few subtyping methods to predict serovars in isolates representing limited diversity and a small number of serovars (19,21,22,(46)(47)(48). For example, Gaul et al (47) compared one banding-pattern method, PFGE, to traditional serotyping on a collection of 674 swine Salmonella isolates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2); however, the identical banding pattern may not necessarily mean that the lymph node strains are related to liver abscess strains. Although PFGE is routinely used to assess strain relatedness in outbreak investigations of food-borne pathogens, in the case of Salmonella, at least with some serotypes, PFGE has proven to be serotype-specific and not strain-specific (Zou et al, 2010). It is not known whether S. enterica is one of the etiologic agents or a secondary invader into an abscess initiated by F. necrophorum, via lymph or blood, and survived.…”
Section: Bacteriologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PFGE has been widely utilized in the molecular characterization of Salmonella species due to the stability of patterns, reproducibility and excellent discriminatory power (Ribot et al, 2002;Peters et al, 2003;Woo, 2005;Zou et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%