Abstract:Pulsed Electric Fields (PEF) is a known technique for the permeabilization of cell membranes, which can considerably foster intracellular component extraction from microalgae. During this phenomenon, the cells are subjected to short electrical pulses leading to the deconstruction of the cell membrane. However, it is currently uncertain in what way, if any, the microalgae cell wall is affected during pulsing. In this study, freshly harvested Auxenochlorella protothecoides (AP) and Chlorella vulgaris (CV) were s… Show more
“…No visible effects of PEF or PEF followed by enzymatic treatment were observed, with cells maintaining their original shape and structure. Similarly, Papachristou et al (2020) did not find any major external modification on C. vulgaris and A. protothecoides after PEF, as did T 'Lam et al (2017) in C. reinhardtii. Additionally, no major morphological changes in A. protothecoides after PEF were described by , who only observed slight shrinkage.…”
Section: Scanning Electron Microscopy (Sem)supporting
confidence: 52%
“…Overall, in this study, PEF treatments improved the lipid extractability from C. vulgaris biomass compared to the untreated control. μsPEF treatment is known to induce membrane permeabilization, but there is no evidence that it can directly impair the cell wall structure (Bensalem et al, 2018;Papachristou et al, 2020;T Lam et al, 2017). Membrane permeabilization might have facilitated the penetration of solvents .…”
Section: Parameter Screening: Effects Of Electrical Field Strength Pu...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hydrophilic proteins were completely released after PEF in cell wall-free mutants, while wild-type cell wall-containing cells showed three times lower protein yields. Although several studies report that PEF does not have a direct impact on the cell wall (Bensalem et al, 2018;Papachristou et al, 2020;T Lam et al, 2017), an increase in the extractability of microalgae intracellular compounds (e.g., protein, lipid, pigments, carbohydrates) by organic solvents or buffer systems after PEF treatment has been described (Aguilar-Machado et al, 2020;Buchmann et al, 2019;Kempkes et al, 2015;Silve, Kian, et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to consider the incubation of a microalgae suspension after PEF treatment, regardless of the mechanism explaining the PEF effects on the cell wall. The studies that showed no impact of PEF on protein extractability (T Lam et al, 2017) or algae mechanical stability (Papachristou et al, 2020) had short or even absent, respectively, incubation of the algae suspension after PEF. In contrast, Jaeschke et al (2019) showed how a minimum incubation step, although short (15 min), was necessary to extract protein from A. platensis after PEF treatment (40 kV cm − 1 , 1 μs, 28-112 J mL − 1 sus ).…”
There is growing demand for gentle technologies to improve the lipid bioaccessibility (BA) of Chlorella vulgaris biomass while preserving cell integrity and therefore oxidative stability. Pulsed electric field treatment (PEF, 5 μs at 20 kV cm − 1 , 31.8 kJ kg − 1 sus ) led to an enhancement in lipid BA from 4-7.8% (untreated) to 18.7-20.9%. To reach such a level of BA, incubation in buffer after the treatment (12 h at 25/37 • C, 48 h at 4 • C) was required. As hypothesized, PEF preserved cell integrity, as shown by particle size and scanning electron microscopy analyses, as well as oxidative stability of the biomass over 3 months at 40 • C. Proteome analysis identified four proteins that may be involved in cell wall lytic activity during incubation after PEF. Future work should focus on further understanding the mechanism behind incubation after PEF and studying the potential effect played by endogenous cell wall-degrading enzymes.
“…No visible effects of PEF or PEF followed by enzymatic treatment were observed, with cells maintaining their original shape and structure. Similarly, Papachristou et al (2020) did not find any major external modification on C. vulgaris and A. protothecoides after PEF, as did T 'Lam et al (2017) in C. reinhardtii. Additionally, no major morphological changes in A. protothecoides after PEF were described by , who only observed slight shrinkage.…”
Section: Scanning Electron Microscopy (Sem)supporting
confidence: 52%
“…Overall, in this study, PEF treatments improved the lipid extractability from C. vulgaris biomass compared to the untreated control. μsPEF treatment is known to induce membrane permeabilization, but there is no evidence that it can directly impair the cell wall structure (Bensalem et al, 2018;Papachristou et al, 2020;T Lam et al, 2017). Membrane permeabilization might have facilitated the penetration of solvents .…”
Section: Parameter Screening: Effects Of Electrical Field Strength Pu...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hydrophilic proteins were completely released after PEF in cell wall-free mutants, while wild-type cell wall-containing cells showed three times lower protein yields. Although several studies report that PEF does not have a direct impact on the cell wall (Bensalem et al, 2018;Papachristou et al, 2020;T Lam et al, 2017), an increase in the extractability of microalgae intracellular compounds (e.g., protein, lipid, pigments, carbohydrates) by organic solvents or buffer systems after PEF treatment has been described (Aguilar-Machado et al, 2020;Buchmann et al, 2019;Kempkes et al, 2015;Silve, Kian, et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to consider the incubation of a microalgae suspension after PEF treatment, regardless of the mechanism explaining the PEF effects on the cell wall. The studies that showed no impact of PEF on protein extractability (T Lam et al, 2017) or algae mechanical stability (Papachristou et al, 2020) had short or even absent, respectively, incubation of the algae suspension after PEF. In contrast, Jaeschke et al (2019) showed how a minimum incubation step, although short (15 min), was necessary to extract protein from A. platensis after PEF treatment (40 kV cm − 1 , 1 μs, 28-112 J mL − 1 sus ).…”
There is growing demand for gentle technologies to improve the lipid bioaccessibility (BA) of Chlorella vulgaris biomass while preserving cell integrity and therefore oxidative stability. Pulsed electric field treatment (PEF, 5 μs at 20 kV cm − 1 , 31.8 kJ kg − 1 sus ) led to an enhancement in lipid BA from 4-7.8% (untreated) to 18.7-20.9%. To reach such a level of BA, incubation in buffer after the treatment (12 h at 25/37 • C, 48 h at 4 • C) was required. As hypothesized, PEF preserved cell integrity, as shown by particle size and scanning electron microscopy analyses, as well as oxidative stability of the biomass over 3 months at 40 • C. Proteome analysis identified four proteins that may be involved in cell wall lytic activity during incubation after PEF. Future work should focus on further understanding the mechanism behind incubation after PEF and studying the potential effect played by endogenous cell wall-degrading enzymes.
“…However, the efficiency of cell disruption by HPH is highly dependent on the conditions used (i.e. the pressure applied and number of passes) and the thickness and chemical composition of the cell wall in different species ( Papachristou et al, 2020 ). To the best of our knowledge, disruption of Synechocystis cells using HPH has not been reported previously.…”
BACKGROUND: Lipid extraction is a major bottleneck for the commercialization of microalgae due to energy costs involved during solvent recycling. Direct transesterification offers the possibility to bypass the extraction step by immediately converting the lipids to fatty acid methyl esters (FAMEs). In this study, the efficiency of direct transesterification after pulsed electric field (PEF) treatment was evaluated. Freshly harvested Auxenochlorella protothecoides (A. protothecoides), cultivated either autotrophically or mixotrophically, was subjected to PEF. Two treatment energies were tested, 0.25 and 1.5 MJ kg dw −1 , and results were compared with those for conventional two-step transesterification.RESULTS: For autotrophically grown A. protothecoides, the percentage of the total FAMEs recovered from untreated biomass and microalgae treated with 0.25 MJ kg dw −1 was 30% for both cases, while for 1.5 MJ kg dw −1 it was 65%. A 24 h incubation step between PEF treatment and direct transesterification significantly improved the results. Untreated biomass remained stable with 30% of FAMEs, while with both treatment energies a 97% FAME recovery was achieved. However, for mixotrophic A. protothecoides the process was not as effective. Approximately 30% of FAMEs were recovered for all three conditions immediately after PEF with only a marginal increase after incubation. The reason for this different behavior of the two cultivation modes is unknown and under investigation. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the synergy between PEF and direct transesterification was proven to have potential, in particular for autotrophic microalgae. Its implementation and further optimization in a biorefinery therefore merit further attention.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.