2023
DOI: 10.17323/1999-5431-2023-0-5-165-188
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Public Sector Innovation: Systematic Review

Abstract: This study aimed to understand what the literature has been approaching regarding public sector innovation and which measurement practices have been used, in addition to seeking research opportunities. The process was guided by the ProKnow-C instrument, a process of selection and critical analysis of the literature which allowed the selection of 33 articles. In general, it was found that: (i) the meaning of what innovation is has changed over the years; (ii) although there are attempts to evaluate these innova… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…16 This knowledge enables a greater understanding of the topic which leads to critical analysis of the literature and identification of possible research gaps. 17 The instrument is continually updated and currently comprises (i) selection of the bibliographic portfolio (BP), (ii) bibliometric analysis, (iii) literature map, (iv) systemic analysis, and (v) formulation of research suggestions (Figure 1). For this study, the processes undertaken were (i) selection of the bibliographic portfolio (BP), (iv) systemic analysis, and (v) formulation of research suggestions.…”
Section: Intervention Instrumentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16 This knowledge enables a greater understanding of the topic which leads to critical analysis of the literature and identification of possible research gaps. 17 The instrument is continually updated and currently comprises (i) selection of the bibliographic portfolio (BP), (ii) bibliometric analysis, (iii) literature map, (iv) systemic analysis, and (v) formulation of research suggestions (Figure 1). For this study, the processes undertaken were (i) selection of the bibliographic portfolio (BP), (iv) systemic analysis, and (v) formulation of research suggestions.…”
Section: Intervention Instrumentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…De acuerdo con (Rodrigues et al, 2023) la innovación es un importante motor de la competitividad potencial para países y organizaciones, y ( Choi & Chand 2009) Existe un creciente interés político en cómo fomentar la innovación en el sector público, afirman (Arundel et al, 2019), y mencionan esto en razón de mejorar la eficiencia en el uso de los recursos, la calidad de los servicios públicos y abordar una amplia gama de desafíos sociales incluidos el cambio climático, demografía, presiones, congestión urbana y desigualdad social y económica; coinciden (Felix & Rubalcaba, 2022) que afirman que una forma en que la innovación pública puede darse, es a partir de la mejora de los servicios gubernamentales que brinda a su ciudadanía o a las organizaciones empresariales, lo que se refleja en la reducción de tiempo que se dedica a las unidades de trabajo de los servicios públicos, por el menor valor de tiempo perdido en hacer un proceso necesario para perseguir la implementación de un deber o derecho para la o el ciudadano o para la organización empresarial.…”
Section: -Innovación Tecnológica Como Elemento Clave De Desarrollo Y ...unclassified