2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.numecd.2021.09.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of protein and amino acid intake estimates from the EPIC dietary questionnaires and 24-h dietary recalls using different food composition databases

Abstract: Background and aims: This study aimed to expand the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) nutrient database (ENDB) by adding amino acid (AA) values, using the U.S. nutrient database (USNDB). Additionally, we aimed to evaluate these new protein and AA intake estimates from the EPIC dietary questionnaires (DQ) and 24h dietary recalls (24-HDR) using different matching procedures.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…28 Individual dietary amino acids have been added to the list of nutrients in the ENDB via matching to the the U.S. nutrient database (USNDB, National Nutrient Database for Standard Reference of the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA)) using a standardised procedure (Supplementary methods). 29,30 This matching procedure produced estimates of protein and energy intakes comparable to the validated estimates in ENDB (weighted kappa = 0.84 and 0.89, respectively). 29 While the estimates of individual amino acid intakes could not be compared with available data in ENDB, the estimates have been compared to those previously estimated independently using a separate protocol in the EPIC-Oxford centre with very high correlations (r ≥ 0.90 for all amino acids).…”
Section: Dietary Intake and Co-variatesmentioning
confidence: 75%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…28 Individual dietary amino acids have been added to the list of nutrients in the ENDB via matching to the the U.S. nutrient database (USNDB, National Nutrient Database for Standard Reference of the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA)) using a standardised procedure (Supplementary methods). 29,30 This matching procedure produced estimates of protein and energy intakes comparable to the validated estimates in ENDB (weighted kappa = 0.84 and 0.89, respectively). 29 While the estimates of individual amino acid intakes could not be compared with available data in ENDB, the estimates have been compared to those previously estimated independently using a separate protocol in the EPIC-Oxford centre with very high correlations (r ≥ 0.90 for all amino acids).…”
Section: Dietary Intake and Co-variatesmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…This matching procedure produced estimates of protein and energy intakes comparable to the validated estimates in ENDB (weighted kappa = 0.84 and 0.89, respectively) 29 . While the estimates of individual amino acid intakes could not be compared with available data in ENDB, the estimates have been compared to those previously estimated independently using a separate protocol in the EPIC‐Oxford centre with very high correlations ( r ≥ 0.90 for all amino acids) 30,31 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…composition data in national food composition databases (42) ; thus, our approach is quite unique. Nevertheless, there are some limitations related to the assessment of AA intakes.…”
Section: Baselinementioning
confidence: 99%