2010
DOI: 10.1037/h0100893
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of preference assessment procedures for use with infants and toddlers.

Abstract: The current practice of preference assessment offers a variety of approaches to determine an individual's preference for specific items. However, the majority of the research has been completed on school-age children or individuals with significant cognitive or behavioral deficits. Further, studies on preference assessments have not adequately addressed the toddler population and have almost completely omitted the infant population. The current paper reviews the literature on preference assessments inclusive o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
(119 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We applied a modified version of the two‐alternative forced‐choice task to the present study. The task was chosen for its strong psychometric properties (see Rush, Mortenson, & Birch, 2010, for a review). In this task, the subject is shown a pair of items and asked to pick one.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We applied a modified version of the two‐alternative forced‐choice task to the present study. The task was chosen for its strong psychometric properties (see Rush, Mortenson, & Birch, 2010, for a review). In this task, the subject is shown a pair of items and asked to pick one.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although two previous reviews on choice have included the preference assessment literature (Cannella et al, 2005;Lancioni et al, 1996), the research in this area has expanded significantly over the last 16 years and has been reviewed thoroughly elsewhere (see Kang et al, 2013;Leaf et al, 2019;Rush et al, 2010;Virués-Ortega et al, 2014). Thus, articles focused on preference assessments were excluded.…”
Section: Search and Coding Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Iako se pokazala efikasnijom od antecedentnih metoda koje uklju-of stereotypies (Lang et al, 2014). It is important that the desired behaviour is defined prior to intervention and an effective reinforcer is selected via one of the preference assessment procedures (for a review, see Rush et al, 2010). The reinforcement schedule (fixed or variable) is also determined in advance.…”
Section: Differential Reinforcementmentioning
confidence: 99%