2004
DOI: 10.1021/jp048707l
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Pore Structure in Pure Silica Zeolite MFI Low-k Thin Films Using Positronium Annihilation Lifetime Spectroscopy

Abstract: The pore size and pore structure in pure silica zeolite MFI in-situ and spin-on low dielectric constant (low-k) zeolite films were characterized by positronium annihilation lifetime spectroscopy (PALS). For the micropores in the in-situ and spin-on films, the pore size obtained from the on-wafer PALS method is 0.55 ± 0.03 nm, and this is in excellent agreement with the known crystallographically determined zeolitic pore size (0.55 nm). To our knowledge this is the first comparison of a PALS thin film pore size… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
32
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
3
32
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However the 0.36 nm zeolite micropore size is considerably smaller than that previous reported for MFI zeolites (containing no cations from synthesis) by PALS (0.55 nm±0.03 nm) [32], by low pressure N 2 adsorption (0.54 nm) [33] or by crystallography for the 10-member ring openings (0.56 nm) [6,30]. 0.36 nm measured in this work could be an average of the accessible intracrystalline spaces as the positrons can access both the 0.55 nm pores and the smaller surrounding chambers within the MFI lattice.…”
Section: Palscontrasting
confidence: 66%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However the 0.36 nm zeolite micropore size is considerably smaller than that previous reported for MFI zeolites (containing no cations from synthesis) by PALS (0.55 nm±0.03 nm) [32], by low pressure N 2 adsorption (0.54 nm) [33] or by crystallography for the 10-member ring openings (0.56 nm) [6,30]. 0.36 nm measured in this work could be an average of the accessible intracrystalline spaces as the positrons can access both the 0.55 nm pores and the smaller surrounding chambers within the MFI lattice.…”
Section: Palscontrasting
confidence: 66%
“…The difference between this measured size and the reported (0.55 nm±0.03 nm) is in a reasonable range. Furthermore, the mesopores measured at 13.5 nm by PALS for high silica MFI zeolites (Table 1) are considerably larger than those from the literature [26,32]. This is likely to be due to the different synthesis conditions performed within different laboratories.…”
Section: Palsmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure 1(b) shows a SEM image of a spin-on PSZ MEL film (type 5) consisting of MEL nanoparticles embedded in a nonuniform, disordered, and porous silica matrix along with an inset showing the MEL framework viewed down the a-axis [18]. In addition, unlike the MFI thin film, the MEL thin films featured also a mesoporosity corresponding to the volume fraction occupied by mesopores 2.3 to 2.6 nm in diameter [21]. These mesopores were located between the disordered silica matrix and the MEL nanoparticles [22].…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We are presently working with IMEC to compare EP results with PALS for pure silica zeolite films. PALS has demonstrated resolution to its 0.55 nm diameter oriented channels [10] but EP may not be detecting them for lack of toluene penetration. Overall, the universal PALS pore size calibration appears to be very reliable but, as we are beginning to now hear at this conference, experiments are searching for a material specific dependence.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%