2009
DOI: 10.1007/s00216-009-2671-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of polyurethane foam, polypropylene, quartz fiber, and cellulose substrates for multi-element analysis of atmospheric particulate matter by ICP-MS

Abstract: Traditional methods for the analysis of trace metals require particulate matter (PM) collected on specific filter substrates. In this paper, methods for elemental analysis of PM collected on substrates commonly used for organic analysis in air quality studies are developed. Polyurethane foam (PUF), polypropylene (PP), and quartz fiber (QF) substrates were first digested in a mixture of HNO(3)/HCl/HF/H(2)O(2) using a microwave digestion system and then analyzed for elements by inductively coupled plasma mass sp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Following gravimetric analysis, the Teflon filter was microwave-digested using an acid mixture according to the method of Upadhyay et al (2009) and Clements et al (2012). The extract was then analyzed for 63 elements by highresolution inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) (ThermoFinnigan ELEMENT 2) using an internal indium standard.…”
Section: Soil Chemical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following gravimetric analysis, the Teflon filter was microwave-digested using an acid mixture according to the method of Upadhyay et al (2009) and Clements et al (2012). The extract was then analyzed for 63 elements by highresolution inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) (ThermoFinnigan ELEMENT 2) using an internal indium standard.…”
Section: Soil Chemical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following gravimetric analysis, the second set of Teflon filters were analyzed for 63 trace elements (including, but not limited to, Al, As, Ba, Ca, Cd, Co, Cr, Cu, Fe, K, Mg, Mn, Mo, Na, Ni, P, Pb, Rb, Sb, Se, Sn, Ti, U, V, Zn) using highresolution inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (HR-ICP-MS, herein referred to as ICP-MS) (ThermoFinnigan, ELEMENT 2; San Jose, CA). Samples were microwave-digested in 30-mL Teflon vials using an acid mixture of 4 mL nitric acid, 0.9 mL hydrochloric acid, and 0.1 mL hydrofluoric acid (Fisher Scientific; Hampton, NH) (Upadhyay et al, 2009). The temperature profile included a 6-min temperature ramp to 140°C, held for 2 min, followed by a 5-min temperature ramp to 165°C, held for 6 min.…”
Section: Sample Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Filter digestion and preparation for elemental analysis are similar to methods reported for the digestion of QFFs, 20 except that smaller acid volumes have been used. Briefly, the PM samples were digested in a mixture of 4 mL HNO 3, 0.9 mL HCl, and 0.1 mL HF using a temperatureprogrammable microwave oven with the following temperature program: 6-min ramp to 140°C and held for 2 min, temperature increased to 165°C in 5 min and held for 6 min, and temperature increased to 180°C and held for 15 min.…”
Section: Sampling and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Details of instrument settings and analytical parameters (resolutions, calibration, instrument detection limits) can be found elsewhere. 20 NIST SRM 1640 (river water) was analyzed after each 12 samples to monitor drift in instrument response. Propagated analytical uncertainties for elements were determined from the square root of the square of the standard deviation (SD) for filter blanks (n ϭ 4) and the square of SD of ambient samples.…”
Section: Sampling and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%