2015
DOI: 10.5455/2320-6012.ijrms20150534
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of placental thickness as a sonological indicator for estimation of gestational age of foetus in normal singleton pregnancy

Abstract: Background: Gestational age is frequently over or under estimated, as the conventional gestational estimation is based on the last menstrual period and on ultrasonography. Many people are unaware of their last menstrual period and irregular menstruation and ultrasonography is bound to have a bias, thereby posing difficulties in the estimation gestational age. Placental thickness measured at the level of umbilical cord insertion appears to be a new promising parameter for estimation of gestational age of fetus … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(9 reference statements)
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our findings are in harmony with the study conducted by Baghel P et al who observed significant positive correlation placental thickness with estimated fetal weight and birth weight. 7 Estimated fetal weight increases with placental thickness (r=0.740 and p=0.000). Adhikari R et al observed that the estimated fetal birth weight which is calculated based on a formula having FL, BPD and AC as variables is dependent on placental thickness which is similar to our observations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our findings are in harmony with the study conducted by Baghel P et al who observed significant positive correlation placental thickness with estimated fetal weight and birth weight. 7 Estimated fetal weight increases with placental thickness (r=0.740 and p=0.000). Adhikari R et al observed that the estimated fetal birth weight which is calculated based on a formula having FL, BPD and AC as variables is dependent on placental thickness which is similar to our observations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GA is frequently over or underestimated, as the conventional gestational estimation is based on the last menstrual period (LMP) and on ultrasonography. Many people are unaware of their LMP, and irregular menstruation and ultrasonography are bound to have a bias, thereby posing difficulties in the estimation of GA.[ 3 ] Hence, there is a need to explore other parameters that may complement the established fetal biometric parameters in predicting GA, especially as pregnancy advances to the third trimester. Placenta has been noted to increase as pregnancy advances in age,[ 4 ] and so the study aims at finding the correlation between PT and GA measured by ultrasonography.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Development of placenta occurs from chorionic villi at the implantation site at about the fifth week of gestation and at the end of tenth week the granular echotexture of placenta can be visualized on ultrasonography. 2 Ultrasound is a safe, inexpensive and easily available method for evaluation of both the fetus and placenta. 3 The most important parameters used to evaluate a pregnancy are the BPD, HC, AC and FL.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%