2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2015.11.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of physical activity interventions in children via the reach, efficacy/effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance (RE-AIM) framework: A systematic review of randomized and non-randomized trials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
45
0
11

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 169 publications
7
45
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…It was concerning that almost no studies reported on these dimensions important to potential adopters of PA interventions in clinical settings. As in this review, the other literature assessing the feasibility to translate interventions into clinical practice found that authors severely underreport important measures from RE-AIM and PRECIS-2, such as intervention costs, BReach^in RE-AIM that corresponds to the PRECIS-2 domains of eligibility and recruitment, as well as the organizational burden of the staff, training, resources, and infrastructure required to deliver an intervention [33,[84][85][86][87]. Without transparent reporting on the cost, adaptations made, and sustainability of PA interventions, it will be impossible for health systems to determine the value of these interventions for their clinical populations with T2D.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…It was concerning that almost no studies reported on these dimensions important to potential adopters of PA interventions in clinical settings. As in this review, the other literature assessing the feasibility to translate interventions into clinical practice found that authors severely underreport important measures from RE-AIM and PRECIS-2, such as intervention costs, BReach^in RE-AIM that corresponds to the PRECIS-2 domains of eligibility and recruitment, as well as the organizational burden of the staff, training, resources, and infrastructure required to deliver an intervention [33,[84][85][86][87]. Without transparent reporting on the cost, adaptations made, and sustainability of PA interventions, it will be impossible for health systems to determine the value of these interventions for their clinical populations with T2D.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Five systematic reviews included both randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and studies that were not randomized or did not include a control and two reviews included RCTs only. Four systematic reviews synthesized results using meta‐analysis, and four undertook a systematic search but described the findings using narrative review . No values were reported in the papers using narrative review; therefore, these are considered in terms of reported significance of effect.…”
Section: Characteristics Of Selected Reviewsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…McGoey et al (2016) found that 68.8% of studies reported statistically significant increases for studies of interventions that focused solely on improving physical activity compared with controls (no values reported). Further, three reviews of studies focusing on interventions that included increasing physical activity as part of multistrategy interventions (including a focus on diet and other lifestyle behaviours) found positive effects for increasing children's participation in physical activity …”
Section: What Are the Most Effective Intervention Components?mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations