2009
DOI: 10.17221/43/2009-pse
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of phosphorus mobility in soil using different extraction methods

Abstract: Soil samples (from Czech and German long-term field experiments) were used to estimate different soil phosphorus (P) fractions. More than 200 topsoil (0-30 cm) samples from different fertilizing treatments were taken. These were analyzed for P in soil solution (P CaCl 2 ) [0.01M CaCl 2 extract], exchangeable sorbed P (P ex ) [anion exchange (aE) membranes] and bioavailable P [Doppel-lactat and Mehlich 3 (P Dl and P M3 )]. other fractions analyzed were total inorganic (P in ), total (P M-tot ) and organic (P or… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The extracted P (mean value of all 50 soils) increased in the order H 2 O < CaCl 2 < LiCl < Fe-oxide P i < Olsen < CAL < CAEM < Mehlich 3 < Bray II < dithionite < organic P < HCl < oxalate < total P (Figure 1). This sequence is in accordance with findings by other authors (Fernandes et al 1999, Csathó et al 2005, Kulhánek et al 2009) and reflects different extraction mechanisms and P pools.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The extracted P (mean value of all 50 soils) increased in the order H 2 O < CaCl 2 < LiCl < Fe-oxide P i < Olsen < CAL < CAEM < Mehlich 3 < Bray II < dithionite < organic P < HCl < oxalate < total P (Figure 1). This sequence is in accordance with findings by other authors (Fernandes et al 1999, Csathó et al 2005, Kulhánek et al 2009) and reflects different extraction mechanisms and P pools.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…These samples were dried at 408C for three days. Available N-NO 3 , N-NH 4 , and P-PO 4 were determined photometrically (540 nm) in a 1:10 (m/v) 0.01 mol/L CaCl 2 extract (Houba et al 1986, 2000, Kulha´nek et al 2009) using an auto-analyzer (Skalar Analytical, Breda, The Netherlands). K was measured in the same extract on an atomic absorption spectrometer (AA240FS; Varian, Palo Alto, California, USA).…”
Section: Soil Nutrientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is one of the strongest extractants to estimate bioavailable nutrients from soils (Kulhánek et al 2009). The method is also used by many laboratories to determine multiple plant-available nutrients simultaneously.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%