2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2013.11.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of personal health record systems through the lenses of EC research projects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
49
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
49
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Another study showed that patients wanted to improve the doctor-patient relationship by actively using PHRs [25]. However, thus far, PHRs themselves are facing a huge barrier to continuous development [5,26,27]. There have been many studies conducted to improve PHRs [16,18,28,29], yet only a few studies have been conducted in which patients used the self-administered features of EMR-tethered PHRs, which can enable shared health care and patient-centered practice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another study showed that patients wanted to improve the doctor-patient relationship by actively using PHRs [25]. However, thus far, PHRs themselves are facing a huge barrier to continuous development [5,26,27]. There have been many studies conducted to improve PHRs [16,18,28,29], yet only a few studies have been conducted in which patients used the self-administered features of EMR-tethered PHRs, which can enable shared health care and patient-centered practice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with a standalone PHR, higher-quality and objective information can be provided by an EMR-tethered PHR. In addition, this type of system can process hospital data in diverse formats and can provide the data directly to the patients [5]. However, patients may lack initiative to manage their medical information actively if they are only given information that is automatically generated by the EMR, and if they are not provided with perceptive value to use PHRs [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the first, Genitsaridi et al [8] take a forensic look at the usability and functionality requirements satisfied by 25 existing PHR systems identified through a search of the international literature. They begin by aligning the PHR concept with the role of the patient as the manager of their health information, whilst acknowledging that other models also exist.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advancements in healthcare practice led to an increasing of the demand for electronic health systems also known as eHealth systems [9]. Personal Health Records (PHRs) aims to provide the patient with the ability to safely and confidentially access, manage and share their health information [11]. PHRs supply patients and healthcare providers with a complete summary of patient's health history and empower patients to have a more active role on their own health, to improve their health literacy with complete and accurate health information, to better communicate with their healthcare providers and to practice preventive self-care routines [7,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Personal Health Records (PHRs) aims to provide the patient with the ability to safely and confidentially access, manage and share their health information [11]. PHRs supply patients and healthcare providers with a complete summary of patient's health history and empower patients to have a more active role on their own health, to improve their health literacy with complete and accurate health information, to better communicate with their healthcare providers and to practice preventive self-care routines [7,11]. Health systems quality of diagnosis and quality of patients' treatment are also improved when PHRs are exchanged [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%