Support for Sustainable Use of Personal Health Records: Understanding the Needs of Users as a First Step Towards Patient-Driven Mobile Health

Abstract

BackgroundThe tethering of a personal health record (PHR) to an electronic medical record (EMR) may serve as a catalyst in accelerating the distribution of integrated PHRs. Creating shared health records for patients and their health care professionals using self-administered functions of EMR-tethered PHRs is crucial to support sustainable use of the system.ObjectiveThis study assesses the factors related to active use of a self-administered function (Health Notes) in an EMR-tethered PHR (Health4U) in a tertiary academic hospital.MethodsThis research is a cross-sectional study conducted in a tertiary academic hospital in South Korea. The enrollees included adults aged 19 years and older with experience accessing Health4U in the 13-month period after June 2013. The primary outcome was the adoption of Health Notes in accordance with the number of chronic diseases. Socio-demographic variables were included as confounding factors.ResultsSubjects 71 years of age and older were less likely to become active users of Health Notes than those 30 years and younger. Moreover, compared with men, women had 44% and 40% lower tendencies to become Health Notes users and active users, respectively. Those who accessed the desktop page and/or mobile page had higher tendencies to become users of Health Notes. We found a consistent increase in the odds ratio as the number of chronic diseases increased in the active users. When considering specific diseases, patients who had cancer or chronic kidney disease had higher tendencies to become users of Health Notes.ConclusionsPatients with a greater number of chronic diseases tended to use PHR more actively, and used the self-administered function. Women and the elderly may have lower tendencies to actively use PHR. Therefore, items specific to the health of each demographic—women, the elderly, and those with chronic diseases—should be carefully considered to support sustainable use of PHRs.

Characteristics of Innovators Adopting a National Personal Health Record in Portugal: Cross-Sectional Study

“…Characteristics of PHR adopters in our study are in line with findings from previous research: PHR registration and use was more frequent in women [ 42 , 65 - 67 ] and younger individuals [ 11 ], with lower registration rates and use being seen in people above 65 years [ 59 , 65 , 67 - 69 ]. The lower adoption by elderly patients should be further studied, as it may be associated with several different factors such as access and use of computers and the Internet, literacy, numeracy, and socioeconomic status [ 37 ].…”

“…As in other studies, we used heuristic definitions to characterize subgroups of adopters according to their use of the PHR [ 11 , 56 - 59 ]. We did not use log-ins as a proxy for PHR use and focused instead on the actual input of personal health information by individuals registered in the PHR.…”

Barriers to patient, provider, and caregiver adoption and use of electronic personal health records in chronic care: a systematic review

“…Functionalities of ePHRs that provide solutions for personalized needs and requirements of chronic patients have important implications for their adoption and use, as also emerged in our review (17,19,74,91,107). One review suggested that features such as access to personal health data and general health information, communicating with providers and support groups, and receiving personal decision support were linked to empirical evidence of bene ts from ePHR-enabled self-management (19).…”

Barriers to patient, provider, and caregiver adoption and use of electronic personal health records in chronic care: a systematic review

“…Functionalities of PHRs that provide solutions for personalized needs and requirements of chronic patients have important implications for their adoption and use, as also emerged in our review (16,18,74,91,106). One review suggested that features such as access to personal health data and general health information, communicating with providers and support groups, and receiving personal decision support were linked to empirical evidence of benefits from PHR-enabled self-management (18).…”