Evaluation of patient satisfaction and shade matching of Vita Suprinity versus lithium disilicate (E-max) ceramic crowns in the esthetic zone: a randomized controlled clinical trial

Abou-Steit, S. A. H.; Elguindy, Jylan; Zaki, Amina

doi:10.12688/f1000research.18337.1

Cited by 10 publications

(10 citation statements)

References 60 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Only 66.7% of restorations in the ZrO 2 group and 80% in the LD group exhibited close marginal adaptation with no evidence of a catch or crevice up to the one-year follow-up. These findings are supported by several studies [ 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 ]. The most probable reason for visible crevices (26.7% after 1 year) in the ZrO 2 group could be that ceramic veneering and layering on zirconia copings may result in an increased marginal gap compared with press techniques [ 56 , 57 , 58 ].…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 85%

The One-Year In Vivo Comparison of Lithium Disilicate and Zirconium Dioxide Inlays

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The objective of the present study was to evaluate the one-year clinical performance of lithium disilicate (LD) and zirconium dioxide (ZrO2) class II inlay restorations. Thirty healthy individuals who met the inclusion criteria were enrolled for the study. The patients were randomly divided into two study groups (n = 15): LD (IPS e.max press) and ZrO2 (Dentcare Zirconia). In the ZrO2 group, the internal surfaces of the inlays were sandblasted and silanized with Monobond N (Ivoclar, Leichsteistein, Germany). In the LD group, the internal surfaces of the inlays were etched with 5% hydrofluoric acid. The ceramic inlays were cemented with self-cure resin cement (Multilink N). Clinical examinations were performed using modified United State Public Health Codes and Criteria (USPHS) after 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 6 months and 1 year. The one-year survival rate was evaluated. In total, one failure was observed in the ZrO2 group. The survival probability after 1 year for the ZrO2 inlays was 93%, and for the LD inlays was 100%, which was statistically insignificant. The differences between both groups for most USPHS criteria (except for colour match) were statistically insignificant. Within the imitations of the present study, the lithium disilicate- and zirconia dioxide-based inlays exhibited comparable clinical performances. However, the colour and translucency match was superior for the lithium disilicate restorations.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 85%

The One-Year In Vivo Comparison of Lithium Disilicate and Zirconium Dioxide Inlays

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…According to Abou-Steit et al (2019), lithium disilicate crowns have excellent patient satisfaction regarding color matching with the natural tooth when used in aesthetic regions [ 24 ]. According to Fasbinder et al (2010), crowns made from computer-aided design (CAD)/computer-aided manufacturing (CAM) lithium disilicate showed no discernible color change after two years of use [ 25 ].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Clinical Study Comparing the Maxillary Anterior Tooth Shade and Fabricated Crown Shade of the Western Uttar Pradesh Population to Commercial Shade Guides

Sinha¹,

Ranjan²,

Chatterjee³

et al. 2023

Cureus

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundIt is essential for dentists and technicians to work together to fabricate and create restorations that are a "perfect" shade match for a particular person. Thus, the Vitapan 3D-Master tooth shade system (Vita Zahnfabrik, Germany) was created and put into use in order to improve the accuracy of shade-selection operations. The objective was to visually assess the color of the maxillary anterior teeth in male and female subjects from various age groups in Uttar Pradesh, India. Materials and methodsThere were 150 patients in total, and they were divided equally into three groups of 50: Group I, which included patients aged 18 to 30; Group II, which included patients aged 31 to 40; and Group III, which included patients aged 41 to 50. Ceiling-mounted fluorescent lighting fixtures with PHILIPS 65 D tubes (OSRAM GmbH, Germany) were installed. Three medical experts provided their opinions as part of this research. The maxillary central incisor was placed next to tabs of various shades, and the doctors' final assessment was based solely on the central one-third of the face. From each of the two sample sets, a total of 30 patients were selected. Once the crown had been made from the prepared tooth of the patient, it was colored according to two shade guidelines (Vita Classic and Vita 3D Master). The three clinicians matched the shade of the manufactured crown with visual shade guides. For shade matching, a modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS) standard was employed. ResultsThe Chi-square test was used to compare categorical variables across groups. According to the Vitapan Classic shade guide, 26% of Group I participants matched the first Hue group (A1), 14% of Group II participants matched the first Hue group (A3), and 20% of Group III participants matched the second Hue group (B2). Master shade guide for Vita 3D 26% of Group I participants matched with the second value group (2M2), 18% of Group II participants matched with the third value group (3L 1.5), and 24.5% of Group III participants matched with the third value group (3M2). Eighty percent of people who were matched to Alpha scored for crowns made using the Vita 3D Master shade guide, while 94.1% of people who were matched to Charlie scored for crowns made using the Vitapan Classic shade guide in a comparison of the two shade guides. ConclusionThe majority of the shades obtained from the Vita 3D master shade guide were found to be 1M1 and 2M1 in the younger patients, 2M1 and 2M2 in the second age group, and 3L 1.5, 3M2 in the older age group. In contrast, the Vitapan Classic shade guide revealed A1, A2, A3, B2, C1, D2, and D3 as the predominant shades.

show abstract

“…However, the outcome signifies that esthetic sense of the women is greater, and therefore they showed greater dissatisfaction for PFM restoration. This can be explained by the fact that male and female use different hemisphere of parietal region, which allows them to develop beauty sense 25 . For women they use both hemispheres, whereas men use only right, which instills greater sense of precision within them.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…For women they use both hemispheres, whereas men use only right, which instills greater sense of precision within them. Hence, spatial relations appear to be a key feature of beauty appreciation 25 .…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of Patient’s Aesthetic Satisfaction after the Cementation of the Porcelain Fused to Metal Crown

Memon¹,

Choudhry²,

Aslam³

et al. 2023

PJMHS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim: To assess the aesthetic satisfaction with the metal-ceramic dental prosthesis in relation to patient education, age and gender. Methods: This prospective longitudinal study was undertaken by selecting 360 adult patients from both genders indicated for single maxillary porcelain fused to metal crowns. These patients were categorized into three groups based on gender, age, and education. Patients were assessed for aesthetic satisfaction for tooth shape; color, angulation, visibility, and shade at the time of insertion and at a follow-up of 12 weeks. At the time of the prosthesis insertion, a self-evaluation questionnaire was provided to each patient to record their satisfaction levels with the prosthesis. Satisfaction levels among the participants were evaluated based on participants' age, gender, and education level (Chi-square). A p-value of 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: The study enrolled 150(41.67%) males and 210(58.33%) females with the participant age ranging from 19 to 60 years and a mean age of 30.53 (± 10.88 years). 84(23.3%) were uneducated participants, 210(58.3%) were high school graduates, and 66(18.3%) were university graduates. A decrease in the level of satisfaction was observed with increasing years of patient education at insertion. The overall aesthetic satisfaction among patients at PFM crown insertion (65%) and at 12 weeks follow-up (69.2%) was statistically comparable (p>0.05). Practical implication: Aesthetic is the most important consideration for the replacement of anterior teeth. Numerous studies evaluated the aesthetic satisfaction of the patients after providing full ceramic prosthesis, however, data regarding patient satisfaction after the metal ceramic dental prosthesisis scarce in the scientific literature. Conclusion: Satisfaction with the esthetic restoration depends on patient education and awareness. Age and education add to a person's experience and increase awareness with respect to better aesthetics. Keywords: Aesthetics; patient satisfaction; assessment; patient care, metal ceramic prosthesis

show abstract

Evaluation of patient satisfaction and shade matching of Vita Suprinity versus lithium disilicate (E-max) ceramic crowns in the esthetic zone: a randomized controlled clinical trial

Cited by 10 publications

References 60 publications

The One-Year In Vivo Comparison of Lithium Disilicate and Zirconium Dioxide Inlays

The One-Year In Vivo Comparison of Lithium Disilicate and Zirconium Dioxide Inlays

A Clinical Study Comparing the Maxillary Anterior Tooth Shade and Fabricated Crown Shade of the Western Uttar Pradesh Population to Commercial Shade Guides

Evaluation of Patient’s Aesthetic Satisfaction after the Cementation of the Porcelain Fused to Metal Crown

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About