2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2018.04.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of olive response and adaptation strategies to climate change under semi-arid conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
45
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
45
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, some studies claim that there is not a significant difference between model performance; for instance, in Alburquerque et al (2008) differences between the DM and Utah model were not found when estimating chilling requirements for cherry cultivars in Spain, or in Ruiz et al (2007) chilling requirements of the evaluated apricot cultivars were very homogeneous according to both the Utah and Dynamic models, also in Spain. Both the Utah and Dynamic models still have room for improvement in terms of accuracy as found (among other chilling models) in Luedeling (2012). In the same study, the DM was recommended for warm regions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Also, some studies claim that there is not a significant difference between model performance; for instance, in Alburquerque et al (2008) differences between the DM and Utah model were not found when estimating chilling requirements for cherry cultivars in Spain, or in Ruiz et al (2007) chilling requirements of the evaluated apricot cultivars were very homogeneous according to both the Utah and Dynamic models, also in Spain. Both the Utah and Dynamic models still have room for improvement in terms of accuracy as found (among other chilling models) in Luedeling (2012). In the same study, the DM was recommended for warm regions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…The projections of the chilling accumulations provided in this study have a lower uncertainty coming from simulated climate scenarios (as indicated by IQR values) than the common uncertainty levels of impact assessments (e.g. Lorite et al, 2018;Tao et al, 2018). This is probably because these chilling models are based only on temperature, and there is higher agreement in the climate change signal related to mean temperature increases than for other climate variables.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The projections of the chilling accumulations provided in this study have a lower uncertainty coming from simulated climate scenarios (as indicated by IQR values) than the common uncertainty levels of impact assessments (e.g. Lorite et al, 2018;Tao et al, 2018). This is probably because these chilling methods are based only on temperature, and there is higher agreement in the climate change signal related to mean temperature increases than for other climate variables.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%