2010
DOI: 10.1080/01490419.2010.491027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Ocean Tide Models Used for Jason-2 Altimetry Corrections

Abstract: It has been over a decade since the last comprehensive accuracy assessment of global ocean tide models. Here, we conduct an evaluation of the barotropic ocean tide corrections, which were computed using FES2004 and GOT00.2, and other models, on the Jason-2 altimetry Geophysical Data Record (GDR), with a focus on selected coastal regions with energetic ocean dynamics. We compared 9 historical and contemporary ocean tide models with pelagic tidal constants, and with multiple satellite altimetry mission (T/P, ERS… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The GPS solutions themselves are biased at specific periods because, during the 24-h positioning process, the frame bias does not exactly average to zero over the course of the time period of the GPS solution (Penna and Stewart 2003;Stewart et al 2005;Penna et al 2007). This bias is Several recent studies have demonstrated that modern tidal models and OTL computation software produce very similar results (Thomas et al 2007;Penna et al 2008;Fok et al 2010). The difference between solutions using OTL-CM and OTL-CE coefficients is much larger than the difference that results from using different tidal models.…”
Section: Theoretical Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The GPS solutions themselves are biased at specific periods because, during the 24-h positioning process, the frame bias does not exactly average to zero over the course of the time period of the GPS solution (Penna and Stewart 2003;Stewart et al 2005;Penna et al 2007). This bias is Several recent studies have demonstrated that modern tidal models and OTL computation software produce very similar results (Thomas et al 2007;Penna et al 2008;Fok et al 2010). The difference between solutions using OTL-CM and OTL-CE coefficients is much larger than the difference that results from using different tidal models.…”
Section: Theoretical Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…However, this was not the case, even as recent as a decade ago. Although tide errors are now on the order of a few centimeters RMS in the open ocean (Fok et al, 2010), any remaining error in the model for a certain constituent will still alias into a small, undesired long-period signal. Although this was large, it was still better than errors in older tide models based only on tide gauge data or hydrodynamic models.…”
Section: Aliasingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The RSS of the In-phase and Quadrature amplitudes (RSSIQ) for the reference ground truth data over M major tides can be served as a denominator for the overall fraction of error of the ocean tide models against the ground truth data obtained from RSS, which is defined as (Fok et al 2010)…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%